There are 12 States in the U.S. That requires ALL parties involved in the conversation (All Party Consent) to be made aware that the conversation is being recorded. These States are:
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Montana
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
The following 38 States require that at least ONE person (One Party Consent) involved in the conversation has given permission for the conversation to be recorded including the person doing the recording:
Alaska
Arkansas
Colorado
District of Columbia
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
This falls under the United States Code: Title 18.2511. As long as you actually take part in the conversation and are doing so in a State that allows "One Party Consent", it is quite legal to record the conversation without another paty in the conversation giving permission or even being told that they are being recorded.
Hope that filly answers your question..
N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-1: A criminal interference with communications occurs when anyone intercepts, records or discloses the contents of any message sent by telephone or telegraph without the consent of a sender or receiver. Illegal interceptions are misdemeanors. Illegal interceptions carry the potential for civil liability for the greater of actual damages, $100 per day of violation or $1,000, along with punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs. N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-12-11. An intermediate appellate court has stated that in New Mexico, "one who voluntarily enters into a conversation with another takes the risk that the other person on the line may memorize, record or even transmit the conversation." New Mexico v. Arnold, 610 P.2d 1214 (N.M Ct. App. 1979), rev'd on other grounds, 610 P.2d 1210 (N.M. 1980).
In New Hampshire (and in 11 other states) ALL parties to the conversation MUST be made aware that the conversation is being recorded.
see below link:
Yes,They are.
No, it is only legal in Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
/get a paper and then get one of your legal guardians to sign such document
Marajuana is medically legal in Alaska, Arizona. California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.
21, just like it is in every other state of the US. ^ that is NOT true. I am not sure about New Mexico's rules but if you look up the laws by state there are a lot of places that allow drinking under the age of 21!
It depends on the circumstances.
Recording a telephone conversation is legal in New York State, providing that at least one party to the conversation consents to the recording. Also, law enforcement may monitor and record telephone conversations if they have obtained a warrant from a judge.
if you want to have a raffle is it legal in state New Mexico
no it is not legal
Escorting is legal almost everywhere, but prostitution is illegal in New Mexico.
Yes there legal in New Mexico, the only places they are illegal are New York City, California, and Hawaii.
Yes,They are.
NO.
No, but they are legal in places like New Mexico, Wisconsin and New Jersey. But I think you have to have a permit for it.
IN THE U.S. - - Unless the record is "expunged" by legal action, offenses ALWAYS remain on your record. Exception: charges levied against a juvenile are no longer available (except to law enforcement) after they become an 'adult.'
The legal age to drink and buy alcohol in Mexico is 18 (right now).
yes, it is legal, however a court may decide if they will allow it to be admitted into evidence... == == == == == == New York is a one party state, however some courts will not admit an interview with a witness to an event if they were not informed they were being recorded. Apparently the judge may use his discretion.