No. The first lady does not get any clothing allowance from the taxpayers. There is a trust fund donated by a private estate that provide money for the first lady's expenses. (see the related link)
Yes
No
$4000 a month now. Previous First Ladies were less fortunate with Laura Bush's being $1500 a month!
Hillary Clinton is the former first lady of the United States and also a politician. Her clothing size is not public information.
You must be first in line and must be wearing a lot of "freaky and Lady Gaga like" clothing.
It was said she spent so much in clothing, that she exceeded the annual salary of her husband, President John F. Kennedy.
All presidents and their families receive the same allowance. The amount was raised in 2001, along with the president's annual salary. President Obama, like President Bush before him, has been paid $400,000 a year; the president also receives $100,000 for travel expenses, and $19,000 for official entertaining. Based on the president's tax returns from 2011, he paid for some of his wife's and daughter's clothing from his salary. It should also be noted that some of the clothes, especially the designer dresses for the First lady and the two Obama girls to wear at special events, are often provided at a greatly reduced amount (or in some cases, no charge at all), because famous designers know that having a first lady (or first daughters) wearing their clothes will cause an immediate boost in sales. I enclose a link to the Barack and Michelle Obama's 2011 tax returns, so you can see what they spent their money on.
No. The first lady is not the real first lady. They call the president's wife the first lady. So if Mitt Romney was the president, his wife would be the first lady. So the first lady's kids are not the first kids
first lady
Cascada is the best & it seems like lady gaga doesn't have appropriate clothing
the lady who was the first lady
Thierry Mugler