You are at work. Expect anything and everything you do to be monitored. They are paying you. Your time is NOT your own at work, nor is anything you produce or do, unless they specifically say that something you’re producing is something you can have for your own personal use, which would be an unusual situation. For example: Perhaps if you work in a restaurant, they might allow you to eat some of the food you’ve helped prepare, once you’re on break, or they may allow you to take leftovers home at the end of the day, if that is their policy. And if it isn’t their policy, then doing so would be theft.
When you are at work, you have hired yourself out. It isn’t social time, nor “deal with your personal affairs” time. It is their time, they are paying you for your undivided attention to be on what benefits the company, and your work email or any email you access while you are on a computer or other device at work is subject to be monitored, as it should be. E-mails should be work related, and personal communication should be done only on breaks, and only on one‘s own personal device, such as a smart phone or iPad. It’s also unprofessional to do otherwise.
It’s wise to not do anything at work that you wouldn’t want everyone to know; or if it’s a job that is inherently discreet, such as with the field of law or medicine, it’s wise not to do anything that you wouldn’t want anyone aside from the normal discretion of your work to know.
And it’s a pretty good rule to live by in life, don’t do anything that you wouldn’t want everyone to know.
The main exception to this would be if you were helping someone, to preserve the dignity of a person, and to keep you doing it for the right reasons, for ethical reasons and by ethical means, you keep it to yourself.
If you’re in a relationship with joint funds, then of course that person needs to be included in those decisions as well, unless you have an agreement that certain level of spending can be done without consulting each other, but again...
...don’t do anything you wouldn’t want them to find out that you did.
So,if someone is even asking whether work has the right to monitor their e-mails, the better question is what is that person asking doing that has them concerned enough to ask? Unless it has to do with a surprise party for the boss...someone might need to brush up on ethics and use of work time and property.
No your employer does not need to inform you that your internet activity or email is being monitored in regards to use of such things on the company computer. You are not entitled to nor should you expect privacy in this case. This has been brought up several times in the past. You should always use the computer as if "big brother" is watching you, this way no adverse actions can be taken against you.
I would think that they have to. But it could depend on the fact that if you r using a work email or a personal email. But i doubt its legal
The employer is obligated to follow its own written policy about employees out on short-term disability leave. The employer cannot, for example, pay for the president's health insurance when she is out on STD leave and then not pay for the entry-level clerk's health insurance when he is out on STD leave. If the employer does not have a written policy, then all employees who take a disability leave should be treated the same.
Unless you have some special written arrangement, mileage reimbursement would be at the pleasure of the employer. In other words, the employer is generally not required to reimburse you at all so their decision to use mapquest is probably ok.
A written statement of employment is a legally binding document which puts the main terms of employment in a document and which an employer is required to give to an employee.
Shawn W. Meyer has written: 'The Marsh Monitoring Program' -- subject(s): Marsh Monitoring Program, Monitoring, Water birds
Colin McDonald has written: 'Monitoring Advertising Performance' 'Tracking Advertising and Monitoring Brands'
Pamela Prior has written: 'Monitoring cerebral function' -- subject(s): Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Evoked potentials (Electrophysiology), Patient monitoring, Physiologic Monitoring
A. M. Kamperewera has written: '1st environmental monitoring report' -- subject(s): Environmental management, Environmental monitoring, Environmental policy, Malawi Environmental Monitoring Programme
Jonathan B. Mark has written: 'Atlas of cardiovascular monitoring' -- subject(s): Atlases, Blood pressure, Diagnosis, Diseases, Electrocardiography, Heart, Heart Diseases, Hemodynamic monitoring, Monitoring, Physiologic, Physiologic Monitoring, Physiopathology
Anna Owen has written: 'Pocket guide to critical care monitoring' -- subject(s): Critical Care, Critical care medicine, Handbooks, Handbooks, manuals, Hemodynamic monitoring, Intravenous catheterization, Methods, Patient monitoring, Physiologic Monitoring
Peter J. Tavner has written: 'Condition monitoring of electrical machines' -- subject(s): Electric machinery, Monitoring
Robert A. Baver has written: 'Monitoring problems'
Richard O. Russell has written: 'Hemodynamic monitoring in a coronary intensive care unit' -- subject(s): Critical care medicine, Hemodynamic monitoring, Hemodynamics, Myocardial infarction, Patient monitoring, Treatment