Judgements of Salomon vs salomon?

Answer:
Court held that salomon was liable to pay the unsecured creditors because the business had been started up by him. salomon appeared in the house of lords and it was held that salomon was merely an agent of the company and not the company being salomon's agent and that after incorporation the company becames a separate person set apart from salomon who had created it and that artifical person was absolutely liable for all the his debts and liabilities.
First answer by ID0701163386. Last edit by ID0701163386. Question popularity: 4 [recommend question].