answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
  1. direct observation-count
  2. indirect observation-estimate
  3. sampling-count small number in a small area and multiply to get the number in the large area
  4. mark and recapture studies-capture, mark, release
  • RACHEL WAZ HERE AND EVERY1 LOVZ HER
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

They keep records

One way is to tag animals. For example, say you tag 100 bison. Later you find 10 bison that are tagged in a herd of 100. You now know that there are about 10 tagged bison for every 100 total bison. If you tagged 100 bison you would have a bison population of 1000. (100 total tagged x 10 in a tagged in a herd)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

There are a couple of ways an ecologist can determine the size of a population without counting every organism. This can be done by either sampling, mark-and-recapture studies, or indirect or direct observation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

There are many ways, it depends on the species being studied. Most methods would use a representative, random sample of the population.

For plants or small, slow-moving animals this can be done using a quadrat, which allows an Ecologist to isolate a small area of a habitat and then count the number of individuals inside that small area. To get an estimate of the total population, multiply the population of the quadrat by the size of the total habitat.

For larger or more elusive animals, such as Tigers, ecologists can count footprints (pug marks.) Like a human's fingerprints, pug marks can be used to identify an individual. By counting the unique pug marks in a habitat, the ecologist can estimate the population.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

They use a meter and they have setup lines around the wildlife the line is called the numberometer it can measure the population of animals inside the lines.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Tried to delete this answer it was purely graffiti

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
  1. Census (physically counting them)
  2. Mass ratio analysis
  3. Volume-ratio analysis
  4. Lincoln Index / "Capture-Recapture" ---> most effective/viable.
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

AP bio? Ms A's class?

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

hbb v v

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are 4 Methods scientists use to determine population size in an ecosystem?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Scientists use many methods to determine the size of a population Which method is best for extremely large populations?

Actually census' are the most accurate estimation (including the estimation of homeless, illegals, etc.)


Which methods would you use to determine the number of mushrooms growing on the floor of a large forest?

Population Density


What are the methods of fishing that disturb the interrelationshipin an ecosystem?

Very effective methods of fishing, which remove a large portion of a specific species all in the same go, can upset the ecosystem.


What is Air Methods's population?

Air Methods's population is 2,739.


What has led scientists to focus more on inductive methods?

The microscope has led scientists to put more focus on inductive research methods.


Which section of a research poster of paper allow es other scientists to repeat an experiment?

for a-plus biology answer to that question is: methods


Who performs critical evaluation of scientific ideas and methods?

No


Why are scientific methods useful?

that is what the scientists use to experiment


What methods do scientists use to answer question?

Logic and reasoning


Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?

Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.


Are environmental scientists unconcerned with methods to preserve natural resources?

It would be false to say environmental scientists are unconcerned with methods to preserve natural resources. Persevering natural resources is a priority among many environmental scientists.


Why do scientists vary the order of the steps of scientists methods?

Because it is possible- if you don't need a step skip it.