The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 upheld the national origins quota system established by
the Immigration Act of 1924, reinforcing this controversial system of immigrant selection. It also ended
Asian exclusion from immigrating to the United States and introduced a system of preferences based on
skill sets and family reunification.
Situated in the early years of the Cold War, the debate over the revision of U.S. immigration law
demonstrated a division between those interested in the relationship between immigration and foreign
policy, and those linking immigration to concerns over national security. The former group, led by
individuals like Democrat Congressman from New York Emanuel Cellar, favored the liberalization of
immigration laws. Cellar expressed concerns that the restrictive quota system heavily favored
immigration from Northern and Western Europe and therefore created resentment against the United
States in other parts of the world. He felt the law created the sense that Americans thought people from
Eastern Europe as less desirable and people from Asia inferior to those of European descent. The latter
group, led by Republican Senator from Nevada Pat McCarran and Democrat Congressman from
Pennsylvania Francis Walter, expressed concerns that the United States could face communist
infiltration through immigration and that unassimilated aliens could threaten the foundations of
American life. To these individuals, limited and selective immigration was the best way to ensure the
preservation of national security and national interests.
Remarkably, economic factors were relatively unimportant in the debate over the new immigration
provisions. Although past arguments in favor of restrictionism focused on the needs of the American
economy and labor force, in 1952, the Cold War seemed to take precedent in the discussion. Notably,
the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations took opposite sides in
the debate, demonstrating that there was not one, clear pro-labor position.
At the basis of the Act was the continuation and codification of the National Origins Quota System. It
revised the 1924 system to allow for national quotas at a rate of one-sixth of one percent of each
nationality's population in the United States in 1920. As a result, 85 percent of the 154,277 visas
available annually were allotted to individuals of northern and western European lineage. The Act
continued the practice of not including countries in the Western Hemisphere in the quota system, though
it did introduce new length of residency requirements to qualify for quota-free entry.
The 1952 Act created symbolic opportunities for Asian immigration, though in reality it continued to
discriminate against them. The law repealed the last of the existing measures to exclude Asian
immigration, allotted each Asian nation a minimum quota of 100 visas each year, and eliminated laws
preventing Asians from becoming naturalized American citizens. Breaking down the "Asiatic Barred
Zone" was a step toward improving U.S. relations with Asian nations. At the same time, however, the
new law only allotted new Asian quotas based on race, instead of nationality. An individual with one or
more Asian parent, born anywhere in the world and possessing the citizenship of any nation, would be
counted under the national quota of the Asian nation of his or her ethnicity or against a generic quota for
the "Asian Pacific Triangle." Low quota numbers and a uniquely racial construction for how to apply
them ensured that total Asian immigration after 1952 would remain very limited.
There were other positive changes to the implementation of immigration policy in the 1952 Act. One
was the creation of a system of preferences which served to help American consuls abroad prioritize visa applicants in countries with heavily oversubscribed quotas. Under the preference system, individuals
with special skills or families already resident in the United States received precedence, a policy still in
use today. Moreover, the Act gave non-quota status to alien husbands of American citizens (wives had
been entering outside of the quota system for several years by 1952) and created a labor certification
system, designed to prevent new immigrants from becoming unwanted competition for American
laborers.
President Truman was concerned about the decisions to maintain the national origins quota system and
to establish racially constructed quotas for Asian nations. He thought the new law was discriminatory,
and he vetoed it, but the law had enough support in Congress to pass over his veto.
Commentary
"I believe that this nation is the last hope of Western civilization and if this oasis of the world shall be
overrun, perverted, contaminated or destroyed, then the last flickering light of humanity will be
extinguished. I take no issue with those who would praise the contributions which have been made to
our society by people of many races, of varied creeds and colors. America is indeed a joining together of
many streams which go to form a mighty river which we call the American way. However, we have in
the United States today hard-core, indigestible blocs which have not become integrated into the
American way of life, but which, on the contrary are its deadly enemies. Today, as never before, untold
millions are storming our gates for admission and those gates are cracking under the strain. The
solution of the problems of Europe and Asia will not come through a transplanting of those problems en
masse to the United States.... I do not intend to become prophetic, but if the enemies of this legislation
succeed in riddling it to pieces, or in amending it beyond recognition, they will have contributed more to
promote this nation's downfall than any other group since we achieved our independence as a nation"
(Senator Pat McCarran, Cong. Rec., March 2, 1953, p. 1518).
"Today, we are protecting ourselves as we were in 1924, against being flooded by immigrants from
Eastern Europe. This is fantastic...We do not need to be protected against immigrants from these
countries on the contrary we want to stretch out a helping hand, to save those who have managed to flee
into Western Europe, to succor those who are brave enough to escape from barbarism, to welcome and
restore them against the day when their countries will, as we hope, be free again...these are only a few
examples of the absurdity, the cruelty of carrying over into this year of 1952 the isolationist limitations
of our 1924 law. In no other realm of our national life are we so hampered and stultified by the dead
hand of the past, as we are in this field of immigration." (President Harry Truman's veto message).
Truman vetoed the McCarran-Walter Act because he regarded the bill as "un-American" and
discriminatory. Truman's veto was overridden by a vote of 278 to 113 in the House, and 57 to 26 in the
Senate. Parts of the McCarran-Walter Act remain in place today but much of it was overturned by the
looked for communist and could potentially revoke their citizenship of USA for up to five years it was vetoed by Truman because it went against constitution and would give communist a strong argument...