answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There is no "Intent to Harm" embodied in civil law. If there was an intent, the charge would be being made under the criminal statutes.

Negligent acts (i.e.: unthinking or unintended) are prosecutable under civil law.

Yes there are. For example, there is the intentional tort of embezzlement. Which can be a crime AND a tort. Knowledge ahead of time of libel; knowing what the outcome will be before you commit the libel etc....

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

Defamation is a tort where there must be an intent to harm, as it involves making false statements that harm a person's reputation. The person making the statements must have known that they were false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Name a tort for which there must be an intent to harm?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Name a tort for which there does not have to be an intent to harm?

Negligence is a tort where intent to harm is not required. It is based on the failure to exercise a reasonable standard of care that leads to harm or injury to others.


What constitutes a tort?

A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or loss to another individual or their property. It can include actions like negligence, intentional harm, or defamation that result in injury or damages, leading to legal liability for the wrongdoer.


What are the relevant mental states in Tort?

negligence, recklessness, intent


Is Strict liability an unintentional tort or intentional tort?

Strict liability is typically associated with unintentional torts. It holds a party liable for damages regardless of fault, meaning that a person can be held responsible for harm caused by their actions without the need to prove intent or negligence.


Must there be criminal intent or criminal negligence to prosecute as a crime?

A criminal act accompanied by a criminal intent is necessary to form a crime. Criminal NEGLIGENCE is a finding in civil and tort cases and is not a criminal element.


Is a threat considered a tort?

Because assault requires intent, it is considered an intentional tort. Tort law specifically state a tort must contain: (a) "the party acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other or a third person, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and (b) the other is thereby put in such imminent apprehension."


What is the personal injury requirement?

The backbone of personal injury cases is tort law. Under tort law you must prove the following to win a case:Duty. The defense must have had a particular civic duty to act in a manner that would not cause harm.Breach of Duty. The defense must have failed to uphold this duty.Causation. The breach of duty must have caused injury to the victim.Injury. The victim must provide proof of harm-whether that harm be physical, emotional or property damage.


What does the word --tort-- mean?

A tort is a civil wrong (as opposed to a criminal offense), for which there is a legal remedy for the harm it caused. Tort law is law created through judges (common law) and by legislatures (statutory law). The primary aim of tort law is to provide relief for the damages incurred and to deter others from committing the same harm.


Is a A principal is liable for any harm caused by his or her agent's tort?

true


Can a tort exist if no injury?

In legal terms, a tort typically involves a wrongful act or omission that causes harm or injury to another person or their property. Therefore, a tort generally requires some form of injury or harm to exist.


What is the difference between intentional tort and unitentional tort?

Intentional torts involve deliberate harmful actions or conduct, where the defendant intended to cause harm or knew that harm was likely to occur. Unintentional torts, on the other hand, result from negligence or carelessness, where the defendant's actions caused harm without the intent to cause it.


What is the difference between assault tort and battery tort?

Assault is the threat or attempt to inflict harm on someone, causing them to fear imminent harm. Battery is the actual physical contact that results in harm or offense. Both torts involve intentional harmful or offensive conduct, but assault does not require physical contact, while battery does.