0
That's a very debateable point. Military governments traditionally are extremely restrictive in allowing personal freedoms of their citizens, and often result in a failed state forming due to mass insurrection against the military government forming. The advantage of it, at least from the standpoint of the country's leaders, is that it's a direct Dictatorship, where the directives of the government can be carried out without being tied up by the political process. Whether it's actually advantageous for the citizens of Nigeria, is questionable at best.another advantage is public opinion which i think is a good issue to look at.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Civilian rule is better than Military rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
Is it just for the us to use military force to prevent the aquisation of nuclear weapons by nations that pose a military threat?
Assuming that the legal civilian government has directed them to use force, yes. If you are wondering about the political implications of using military force in that manner then a political forum would be a better location for this question.
Support the motion which says civil rule is better than military rule?
cilivian rule is better than military because cilivian are more civilized than the military they are more peaceful than military
Why is military experience important to become president?
then it lets them control military better
What is confederate force?
A Confederate force is to be understood as a military unit or more military units, whose consistency is not better specified, pertaining to the CSA Army and performing a military operation.
Points on Military government is more suitable for Nigeria than Sivilian government?
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
Are military rules better than civilian rules?
there are more rules in military than civilian
Who does a better job at defendant their defendants when in a court-martial military appointed lawyer or a civilian lawyer?
Civilian law and military are very unalike. Unless the civilian lawyer is skilled and practiced at military law, I would go with the military counsel every time.
Civil rule preferable to military rule?
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
Is civilian government better than military government?
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
How will Nigeria be if Obasanjo where a philosopher?
Nigeria may be a better and more developed country. Obasanjo did improve nigeria but not as much as he could have. Nigeria needs a people who have good morals and want nigeria to change for the better.
Advantage of civilian regime?
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
Is military rule better than civilian rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
Civilian rule is better than Military rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
Why is civilian rule better than military rule?
The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military
Is it just for the us to use military force to prevent the aquisation of nuclear weapons by nations that pose a military threat?
Assuming that the legal civilian government has directed them to use force, yes. If you are wondering about the political implications of using military force in that manner then a political forum would be a better location for this question.
Why is military rule better than the civilian rule?
Usually it isn't. Behind the outward show of efficiency, military systems are too inflexible to operate smoothly, and many highly sinister types can be found hiding behind the raiment of respectability. Only when a country is descending into violent mob-rule or rotten with corruption do you have to send for the military. It's a pretty desperate cry for help.
