What is the role of students to protect environment?

Answer 1

Students, the most powerful stratum of the society, knows the importance of environment and nature sustainability. Nature has endowed us with all the resources to which maximum beneficiary is human beings. Nature has full proof system of protection of all the creatures and environment subject to check on excessive pollution and resources utilisation.

Students understand the need for protecting environment and they are prepared to fight against the contamination of atmosphere as todays student is tomorrow's citizen. They show the consciousness and save the various energy sources by going on foot or bicycle to schools and other places. Students may Go to bed in the evening no sooner sun sets. They may develop the habits of Reading and writing in day lights. With their efficient skills of interaction with other parts of the society, they communicate to the society about need for protecting environment. Students may promot use of cold water in day to day activities if temperature/atmosphere permit. Students need to promote the plantation in surrounding areas. They should help the government and non government organisation in preventing pollution from the society by actively participating in programmes and by giving the informations of those who pollutes the environment.

Students in all disciplines of education may contribute some from the knowledge in the area of their expertise. They make creative contribution to arrest pollution and protect environment. It is not only industrial pollution but the pollution from various day to day operations that needs checking for protecting environment. Thus student can play a pivotal role in changing the scenario of protecting environment.

Answer 2

One of the most important things to remember is that today’s students are tomorrow’s leaders.

When students become educated about the role of pollution and the many ways to reduce environmental pollutants, they take that knowledge with them into the future, when they will be in a position to effect real change. Studies have shown that ideas that we adopt in our youth help to shape our actions decades late. When we develop a cohort of students who understand the risks of pollution and feel strongly about the need for a clean environment, we create a real core constituency that will demand action and change when they come of age. Even in the immediate present, students who develop strong feelings about pollution can put pressure on their parents to advocate for change and to vote accordingly right now.

Ultimately, the fight against pollution won’t be won until the largest polluters, including major multinational corporations, agree to work together to impose sensible limits on the amount of pollution released into the environment. Many governments have tried to regulate pollution, but corporations merely move to places with laxer regulations, or lobby to change laws to allow more pollution. Students around the world can pitch together to lobby their governments to stand up to pollution and to work with one another across the globe to ensure that there is no place for polluters to run to maintain their unsustainable and dangerous business practices.

Around the world, one half of the population is under the age of 25, and that means that primary, secondary, and university students can have an enormous impact if they were to gather together to use their collective numbers to advocate for change. Currently, surveys find that many young people waste massive amounts of materials, from paper to plastic bottles, and more. By changing their attitudes and values, we can make a big difference in how much material ends up in the millions of tons of waste dumped into landfills and into the oceans around the world. According to professional dissertation writing, fourteen billion pounds of pollution, mostly plastic, is dumped into the world’s oceans each year.

So what can students do about pollution? The first thing students can do is to take personal action against pollution right now. Students can change their own consumption patterns. They can recycle more and waste less. They can choose sustainable products from ethical manufacturers, and they can avoid food waste by planning meals more carefully. All of these steps are good foundations for helping to create a more environmentally friendly lifestyle.

Beyond this, students can work together to encourage family and friends to do the same, and they can advocate in their communities for better recycling programs and for sustainable practices at the business level and the governmental level

Answer 3

The world is not a nice place, and everything revolves around money. Any person on this planet has some money, and they spend it. The best way to help environment is to spend your money supporting environmentally conscious behaviour in companies, and punishing those who do the opposite. DO this all the time, and you have won your fight.

It is important that you don't overdo it. If you start bothering everyone around you with long speeches, rants against the government - they will find that the environment is a dreadful, boring issue and that they are helpless. Rather let the people around you come to you and ask - for example, why are you buying this and not that. Give a simple answer, short, don't be a smartass. This way, people won't feel like you feel moraly superior.

Answer 4

= I. Introduction = In the past decades, calls for environmental protection have emerged from different parts of society, from civic action groups to members of the community. In the same regard, these demands are indeed backed up by well-researched studies and well-documented cases and accounts of the adverse implications of environmental abuses and maltreatment. These are eventually heeded by legislative bodies in both local and international scale. Nevertheless, ratification of such laws in pursuit of protecting the environment may not be enough. At this point, enforcement of such laws is as important as its existence and ratification. This task is given to the state. The effective enforcement averts the possibility of these laws as merely ceremonial at the most and be treated as mere suggestions for those who appear to have encountered environmental dilemmas on their normal day-to-day functions. As indicated, the international community has started decades ago to create a standardised set of laws that could be implemented by nations all around the world. Nevertheless, there are certain elements indicating whether these laws are practicable in a universal sense. Certain states and nations may not see it fit to implement certain provision of the law in their local settings. This issue is well seen in the context of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HUSSAR). To this end, the primary objective of this paper is to provide a detailed examination of the existing laws in environmental protection and the consequent enforcement of HUSSAR on these legislations. The secondary objective is to compare these legal initiatives as well as the effectiveness of enforcement with the legal regime governing in other countries. For the purposes of this thesis, the foreign countries to be regarded will include Australia and the United Kingdom. Moreover, it is also deemed important for this study to address another legal regime in Asia in its pursuit for environmental viability. To this end, the study will also look into the case of China. = II.Background and Concept behind the Statement = Studies focusing on the environment and its protection have constantly been regarded by lawmakers and politicians in both international and local levels in determining the proper rules and legislations needed in a particular state. For instance, studies have mentioned several areas of concern which could be addressed by legislation. These include the quality of the air, the quality of water, level of noise pollution, waste disposal, and its consequent environmental impacts. The need to determine the need to address these perceived elements involving the environment intensifies almost in a daily basis. Particularly, with the continuous and unrelenting drive of state towards development and urbanisation, these stated elements will continue to deteriorate unless the state places a firm stand on its protection and act on breaches on these laws. Focus on the environmental regime governing Asian countries has been rather scant as compared to the discussion relating to the United States and European Union. However, these types of discussions relating to these major countries tend to provide a model for less developed ones in the enforcement of such laws. For instance, the study of tried to justify the criminalisation of the laws covering environmental protection to intensify the enforcement of the laws and some level of protection because of the consequent deterrence it could bestow as precedent cases are established. In the context of China, it has won it bid and anticipating the hosting of the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing. Articles have noted that the city, as well as the entire country's environmental well-being was rather Coal burning and emissions from automobile and the industrial areas were not regulated. The rivers were brimmed up with sewage and pollutants. In this regard, the state has been up in arms in battling this deteriorating state of environment in China. In the recent study of Schmidt, he pointed out that hosting the summer Olympics should "serve as a catalyst for environmental improvement and help to promote sustainable development" on the part of China. Cheesier on the other hand indicated that this would be feasible considering the fact that the "country's leadership can make tough big-ticket decisions and implement them quickly." The study intends to look into the enforcement of environmental laws in Hong Kong. Specifically, the discussions will provide a comparative analysis of the implementations in other states like China, United Kingdom, and Australia. To keep the discussions coherent and systematic, the dissertation will answer the following questions: 1. How does the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region implement laws pertaining to: a. Conditions of Air Quality b. Noise Control c. Wastes Management d. Water Quality e. Environmental Impact Assessment 2. How does the implementation of laws in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region fare up with China in terms of a. Conditions of Air Quality b. Noise Control c. Wastes Management d. Water Quality e. Environmental Impact Assessment 3. How does the implementation of laws in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region fare up with Australia in terms of a. Conditions of Air Quality b. Noise Control c. Wastes Management d. Water Quality e. Environmental Impact Assessment 4. How does the implementation of laws in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region fare up with United Kingdom in terms of a. Conditions of Air Quality b. Noise Control c. Wastes Management d. Water Quality e. Environmental Impact Assessment 5. How can Hong Kong implement these existing environmental laws in the impending Beijing 2008 Summer Olympics? There appears to be a scarce amount of studies and articles pertaining to the capabilities and competencies of the special administrative region to implement its laws pertaining to the protection of the environment. In the same regard, there has yet to be a study that focuses on the regard of judicial bodies on "environmental crimes" in the said region. This dissertation will be able to unlock the information on the level of implementation and criminalisation of breaches of environmental legislation. In the same regard, the assessment will also be based on the presentation of the level of implementation and regard of courts on the respondent countries. In doing so, not only does the dissertation provide the readers an analysis of the legal conditions in Hong Kong, it also gives a detailed description of the legal systems of enforcement implemented in Australia, UK, and China. The study will be discussing the laws pertaining to air quality, noise, wastes, water quality, and environmental impact assessment implemented in Hong Kong. In the same regard, research will be made on such areas and its implementation in the respondent countries of China, Australia, and United Kingdom. Along with the description of the actual laws implemented in the said respondent countries, court decisions and some case laws relating to the environment laws will be taken into account. Moreover, the study will also consult past and existing academic and scholarly articles covering environmental enforcement with the rest of the world. = III. Literature Review = This part of the study seeks to establish the theoretical frameworks of the dissertation by discussing the claims and observations held by the existing literature. Specifically, the discussions will be covering existing studies on international treaties on the environment, the watchdogs that protect these treaties, trends towards criminalisation, the implications of international events like the Olympics in the environment, and observations regarding the legal regime of environment protection in China, Australia, and UK. In the international arena, the issues of environmental protection and polices are covered primarily of treaties and signed agreements of particular participants of a certain international assembly. One such treaty is The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Basically, this treaty intends to point out certain issues of the environment surrounding sustainable development. The agreement establishes a precautionary principle in environmental protection. This is displayed in the passage in the signed treaty indicating that "In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation." Basically, this passage presents the intention of the agreement to use policies to prevent any possible act that may compromise the sustainable development of a particular nation. However, issues related to economic and investment opportunities are linked to such conditions of sustainable development. As Cowling indicated in his study, noted in his study that multinational corporations tend to favour operations in a developing country because of the possibility of making the most of its Natural Resources. In recognising this reality, he further intimated that developing nations are not in the position to protect its resources for purposes of sustainable development given the motive of multinational corporations. The Rio Declaration dismisses this apparently unequal situation for developing nations. This is seen in Principle 11 of the declaration indicating that "States shall enact effective environmental legislation. Environmental standards, management objectives and priorities should reflect the environmental and developmental context to which they apply. Standards applied by some countries may be inappropriate and of unwarranted economic and social cost to other countries, in particular developing countries." Other international agreements have focused it attention to what was noted as "transfrontier pollution." Basically, this type of pollution affects not only a particular area in the globe; it implicates a greater and wider range of adverse effects in the environment. The Geneva Convention on Long-Range Tran boundary Pollution is the prevailing agreement that covers this issue. Created in 1979 in the first world climate conference, the principle of the agreement is to take into consideration the implications of sulphur emissions and its relation to acid rain. The possibility of the occurrence of greenhouse effects has been one of the greatest issues at that period. The problem in that regard is that despite the decrease in the sulphur emissions, the increase of nitrous oxide has been apparent as the increase in road traffic in the rest of the world is becoming commonplace. This agreement is closely connected to the subsequent high profile international conventions and protocols. Basically, these said agreements focused entirely on the possibility of climate change and how to prevent it. These include the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Changewhich spawned the Kyoto Protocol on Global Warming. In the said protocol, the countries participating in the said convention "agree to cuts in emissions of three of the most important gases: carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide." Studies have mentioned the adverse implications of climate change to both the environment and the public. For instance, the work of , intimated that population sheath may be compromised by drastic changes in the levels of heat and consequent torrential rainfalls as a result of global warming. They also mentioned the possibility of intensification and even evolution of Infectious Diseases present in the environment. In the context of marine protection, the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter was ratified in 1972. It is more commonly known of the London Convention of 1972. Basically, the said convention covers the intentional disposal of waste in the sea. Along with this is the list of substances that have different levels of adverse effects once they are dumped in water systems. Nevertheless, a clear shortcoming of this agreement is that it doesn't cover the discharges from land-based structures. This agreement is succeeded by Protocol 1996 and successfully addressed this previously mentioned shortcoming. In the said innovation, changes were made to emphasise new concepts like "precautionary approach" and punishment of the perpetrators of pollution. In the same regard, Protocol 1996 has also changed the actual list from the London Convention to a "reverse list." This means that those that intend to dump substances in the sea, these substances have to correspond to the listed elements. If the dumped substances are not included in the list, then sanctions will apply. As indicated in the earlier parts of this dissertation, the performance and enforcement of environmental laws are as important as its actual ratification. The following discussion will be describing the organisations and international bodies that seek to carry out the principles of the international agreements indicated above. For instance, the United Nations Commission for Sustainable Development (UNCASED) is the sanctioned authority by the UN to handle the implementation of the agreements ratified in the Earth Summit in 1992. Specifically, the UNCASED is tasked to make sure that the member countries have corresponding laws that honours the principles of the Rio Declaration on sustainable development, which the United Nations coined as Agenda 21. On the other hand, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-EKE) also holds on the responsibility of implementing protocols indicated in the Geneva Convention on Long-Range Tran boundary Pollution. The UN-EKE specifically has to make sure that the eight protocols ratified in the convention are properly followed and possess similar legislations in the participant countries. Protocols on ground-level ozone, organic pollutants, sulphur emissions, organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide are among those included in the mandate of the commission. In 1972, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNAPT) was created to help individual states to deal with the concerns of sustainable development. According to the work of Mole, UNAPT has to carry out the following activities "Assessment and protection of atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems; promotion of environmental science and information; early warning of problems and emergency response capacity to deal with environmental disasters and emergencies" Moreover, it is also maintained that countries who fail to comply with the self-enforcing requirements of the company may be taken to the International Court of Justice. In any case, the organisation could also act as a body that broker arrangements with countries that are seen to closely breach the said agreement. Aside from organisations sanctioned by the United Nations, private organisations and civic groups tend to heed the call and remind states and other private organisations of their responsibilities as indicated in environmental law. One of the most noted and well-renowned organisations are Greenpeace. According to their website, the organisation is described as "a global campaigning organisation that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace by catalysing an energy revolution to address the number one threat facing our planet: climate change; defending our oceans by challenging wasteful and destructive fishing, and creating a global network of marine reserves; protecting the world's remaining ancient forests and the animal, plants and people that depend on them; working for disarmament and peace by reducing dependence on finite resources and calling for the elimination of all nuclear weapons; creating a toxic free future with safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals in today's products and manufacturing; and porting sustainable agriculture by encouraging socially and ecologically responsible farming practices." Created in 1971, the organisation has been fighting environmental breaches from global warming and genetic testing to nuclear power and nature destruction. The quote above indicates that not only does the organisation focus on abuses; it also tries its best to encourage sustainable consumption of the natural resources. Over the years, the organisation has acquired the favour of the public as accounts of their extraordinary feats as well as the actual footages of "heroic" programmes established them as the protector of nature and mother earth. This organisation in fact has spawned numerous other organisations operating in a much smaller scale, specifically regional and local operations. In Hong Kong, there are three existing environmental organisations: Friends of the Earth, Green Power, and the Conservancy Association. These organisations tend to focus on environmental education and discuss issues on conservation and policies of the government. A recent trend in the ratification and enforcement of environmental laws is to "make the polluter pay." Basically, this is an element of the principle of environmental protection and pollution control which is often misconstrued by legislators and states as they implement these environmental laws. For instance, Adler pointed out that "pollution control efforts should focus upon instances where an unwanted emission causes actual harm and not on whether a company complies with a permit or generates the right amount of waste." This is a classic example of the implications of misinterpretations and possible skewed perception on how the law should be created. Pollution control should therefore focus on the harm done instead of the compliance of those involved. This is similarly inked with the efforts to extensively criminalise the breach of environmental laws. In the United States, scholars have indicated that the laws implemented in the land are described as "over-criminalised." This merely points to the imposition of sanctions on the perpetrators of what has been coined as "green collared crimes." It has been noted in studies that the main rationale of this criminalisation of environmental laws is to ensure protection through deterrence. However, the issue on imposing such sanctions and presenting rather harsh repercussions for polluters still is subject to debate. For instance, there have been claims as to whether deterrence should be equated with the culpability of the offender. Essentially, this claim covers the sentencing approaches held by courts hearing environmental cases. The problem is that "the substantive law, however, does not grade the offences or otherwise make meaningful distinctions among offenders based on culpability." This means that the process of sorting tends to encounter some discrepancies depending on the level of culpability of the offenders. In the context of the actual sanctions, criminalising these environmental offences mentioned falls on monetary and non-monetary sanctions. The former includes those that involve fines and other fees for damages as seen by the courts, the latter on the other hand includes those that involves possible community service and even incarceration. This is rather complex on the part of the individual states implementing these environmental laws since "non-monetary sanctions are costly to impose." The issue on whether monetary sanctions will suffice as a means to actually deter the future actions detrimental for the environment. As Babbitt and his colleagues place it, "a harmful act will be more difficult to deter with monetary sanctions alone when benefits to the violator are high, harm is substantial, the probability of imposing sanctions is low, and/or the level of violator assets is modest compared to harm done." International events tend to also leave major implications on the environment. This reality has been apparent yet has been tackled scarcely in literature. A recent article of Schmidt has highlighted the environmental implications of major sporting events. The article indicated that such events tend to place an immense "environmental footprint" which essentially equates to the abuses both intentionally and unintentionally imposed. The study focused on events like the Summer and Winter Olympics, Super bowl, and World Cup. He noted that the in the 2006 Super bowl of the National Football League, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted from transportation and use of facilities summed up to over 500 tons in that day. The Athens Olympics in 2004 recorded 500,000 tons within its two weeks of operations. On the other hand, the study mentioned that the World Cup consumed three million kilowatt-hours worth of energy for every game it played and not to mention the litter amounting to over ten tons. Other major sporting events like the NASCAR races in the United States have also been tackled and mentioned to have considerably impressed a massive footprint in the environment of the US. In this type of sport, environmental problems like noise pollution and emissions from leaded gas are mentioned to contribute to that footprint. However, international bodies like the UNAPT have been doing its share to deal with these issues. In the same account, the administrative bodies that govern these events have also taken the initiative to police their activities and minimise their impact to a particular site. One such example is the initiative of the International Olympic Committee (OAK) and the individual Olympic Organizing Committee (O.C) in the host countries have maintained the principles indicated in Agenda 21 of the UN. Even in countries like China where the 2008 Summer Olympics will be held, initiatives towards minimising the adverse implications of pollution though information and educational drives are implemented. = IV.Methods and Procedures = The dissertation will be using the descriptive form of research. Basically, this form of study is based on observed data. (1996, 443) In this study, the assumptions and observations are to be based on the empirical evidence regarding environmental laws and the specific actions take in the special administrative region of Hong Kong as well as those in the UK, Australia, and China. However, there are some limitations on the use of the said methodology. Basically, the study would not be able to make inferences on causality. Nevertheless, the findings will be able to create an impetus for further research on the topic. Though there may not be any conclusive statement that could be made on this study, the findings highlight the conditions surrounding the existing legal regime in the management and protection of the environment in Hong Kong. It is in these findings that the recommendations on certain developments in the environmental laws in the region. On the other hand, the study will primarily acquire qualitative data and analysis. This means that the study will be employing inductive reasoning in its analysis and observation of the data extracted from the primary sources of the study which include China and HUSSAR legislation, court decisions and case laws in UK and Australia, and discussions from academic and scholarly journals directly related to the topic. = V. The Environmental Laws in Hong Kong (20) = This part of the study will be the part where the comparison of the existing legislation on the respondents countries of China, Australia and UK. Basically a description of the Hong Kong legislation will be made first and will consequently be compared to the legal regime present in the said countries. Since the focus of this study is Hong Kong, it is imperative to provide the governing legislation involving the environment in the said administrative region. In the same manner, providing such an account on this set of legislation will make research on similar laws and case laws in the other respondent countries of China, Australia and the United Kingdom. Specifically, the areas of concern to be covered include air quality, noise, waste, water quality, and environmental impact assessment. To provide a summary of the points of argument, a sub-conclusion will be given after every end of a particular set of environmental legislation. The following discussions will include the primary legislations that involve the protection of the air quality of the special administrative region. The data below are to be based on the actual manuscript of the legislations. The primary legislation covering the protection of the quality of air in Hong Kong is the Air Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap.311). This law was originally enacted in 1983 to deal with emissions and other harmful discharge in the air of HUSSAR. This means that the law covers motor vehicles, industrial and power plants, construction and the dangers of asbestos. In the said ordinance, a set of objectives called Air Quality Objectives (AQUA) indicated in s7 and s8. The elements of "sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, photochemical oxidants, lead, total suspended particulates and reparable suspended particulates" are included in the air pollutants noted as among those which the administrative region has to deal with. In the same regard, the ordinance allows the authorities to bestow legal notices if they sense any breach on the legislation. For instance, s10 of the ordinance indicates that the authorities could give possible offenders Air Pollution Abatement Notice if any of the stated air pollutants were detected on the "polluting activity." On the other hand, s30 of the ordinance provides the administrative region the authority to give out notices to take certain actions if they find out that air pollution results from any form of improper design or operation of their equipments. Similarly, Asbestos Abatement Notices are also in order once the state recognises any operation in poor from regarding asbestos removal activity as indicated in s79 of the ordinance. In the context of ozone protection, the special administrative region has enacted quite a few set of laws that covers this area of environmental protection. The discussion here will present the Ozone Layer Protection Ordinance (Cap. 403) 1989 andOzone Layer Protection (Controlled Refrigerants Regulation) == This ordinance makes the Vienna Convention of 1985 and Montreal Protocol of 1987 effective under the regime of Hong Kong. This means that Hong Kong has to comply with the obligations and responsibilities provided by the said international treaties. Basically, this legislation prohibits the manufacturing of any ozone depleting substances. However, this is not an actual total ban on such items; the law also indicates that these ozone-depleting substances are sanctioned if and only if they are to be used primarily on academic purposes and if they are no more than 1 kilogram in a 12-month period. In the same regard, the law also covers those who import and export these types of substances. This means that the traffic of these substances is also controlled by the state. In s5 of the ordinance, it calls for the registration and the need to acquire a license to manufacture and import or export (s4 and s6) these substances. It also indicates the monetary and non-monetary sanctions imposed by the state. Failure to register is liable to $25,000 fine while operating without a license or any breach of the conditions of the license is liable to a $1,000,000 fine with a 2-year imprisonment. In the same regard, the ordinance provides the authorities power to enforce the said laws. The said laws give the state authority to enter and search, and even to use reasonable force on a person or a particular area suspected to have breached the ordinance. In the same regard, the state is given the power to summon documents from a person for examination and investigation as to whether it has breached the ordinance or not. Similarly, the state is also given the power to seize control of anything other an aircraft, vessel or vehicle. At any rate, the ordinance gives the state the capacity to take whatever it requires to implement these provisions within its jurisdiction. == == == == == == == The Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap. 354) is the foundation of the waste management regime in Hong Kong. This was initially enacted in 1980 and was subjected to at least eight amendments since. The amendments constitute simple control of livestock to more complex compliance of international laws enacted in the Basel Convention. == == == Hong Kong is governed by the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Cap. 358) which was enacted in 1980. This is the foundation of the regime protecting water control zones (Wss) within the boundaries of the administrative region. This means that the law covers discharges on these Wss, specifically of oil and other hazardous substances from vessels. This law was amended twice, 1990 and 1993, which added provisions like the removal of exemptions as well as the increase in regulation in water waste coming from commercial and industrial sectors of Hong Kong. == == == In line with the purposes of avoiding further adverse implications in the environment, Hong Kong has also enacted a law requiring any project carried out in the administrative region to go through an environmental impact assessment process (EIE) and acquire permits before commencing. This is embodied in the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap. 499). This serves to protect the environment from any adverse effects of the project in the future. == == ==

Answer 5

Students have big roles with regards to the conservation of our natural resources. They can dissiminate information about the proper ways of handling and using our precious natural resources by not over using it. By not engaging in elligal logging that destroys and barren our forests. With regards with our bodies of water, don't pollute them with any kinds of toxic and harmful chemicals that usually produced by mining companies in the form of mine tailings. These chemicals directlly went to rivers, lakes and seas which in effect destroys also all form of marine life including our corals. Also political will from our authority especially the DENR which issues the permit for these mining companies to lay down the ground rules with regards to the parameter of their mining exploration without destroying our precious environment.

Answer 6

Students can participate in local activities and clean up efforts. They can also serve as conservation educators and local resources. They can serve as advocates for the environment.

Answer 7

role of individual in protection of environment

Answer 8

They plant trees and they make campaigns about how to take good care of our surroundings.