What does this accomplish? Owners becoming richer, Americans losing jobs, and host country employees receiving dirt for pay.
Socialists believe there should not be businesses in the current sense. The land, factories, offices etc should belong to all the people in common.
I don't think it can be stopped... but it should definitely be revised. If companies want to move overseas, then let their products stay overseas and be purchased by the cheap labor force they hire that are killing the American job industry, and vise versa, if you want to sell a product in the USA then make sure it is 100% made in the USA. That would bring back millions of jobs for U.S. citizens and bring more revenue and tax money to all states that are having major deficit/budget problems.
you always need food otherwise, you'd get famine more food= more people to work in factories
There is no universal rate. It depends on the area, the size of the building, and the rates in your specific region. You should call some companies in your particular area for prices.There is no universal rate. It depends on the area, the size of the building, and the rates in your specific region. You should call some companies in your particular area for prices.There is no universal rate. It depends on the area, the size of the building, and the rates in your specific region. You should call some companies in your particular area for prices.There is no universal rate. It depends on the area, the size of the building, and the rates in your specific region. You should call some companies in your particular area for prices.
characteristics of cottage industries
it smells
Well, YES!
Because fluorocarbon is used in refrigerators to help store food. You should try to Google it, that's what I did.
If US companies move their jobs overseas , it will be highly profitable for the company owners, not for the US government. According to a study estimated $2 trillion in overseas profits generated by U.S. companies that are not repatriated, or returned to American shores. Policymakers have noticed that companies make money in foreign companies but avoid having to pay federal tax on that income, which robs the U.S. Treasury of revenue. As companies grow overseas because of the tax advantage, they create jobs in countries like Singapore and Spain – jobs many critics believe would otherwise be created domestically.
This question involves an opinion. We don't do opinions.
visa regulations should be relaxed for overseas students
what factories?
I'll get it started, investing overseas can be considered diversification of your portfolio. An account investing overseas is not as susceptible to US market fluctuations and gives you a chance to have stock in companies in other markets. While this is all true, it turns out as we've seen in the recent financial crisis that the US market can have much effect on other markets.
I agree companies should be allowed to hire who they want without interference. They can pick the best person for the job regardless of color of skin or nationality. This will help each company be profitable and contribute more to the economy.
There are truly no reasons as to why FaceBook should not be allowed.
yes
I do not think that fast food companies should be able to advertise. It encourages heavy consumption of unhealthy products. I also think that kid's meals should be outlawed, except for healthy meals, as it encourages children to lead unhealthy lifestyles.