YES,THEY SHOULD. A CUSTODIAL MOTHER GET'S CHILD SUPPORT WHY WOULDNT THE FATHER. IT WORK'S BOTH WAY'S.
A father is responsible for creating the child and therefore he is responsible for supporting it. It is difficult to imagine who else should be financially responsible.
Of course. Unless the non-custodial parent takes sole custody, the non-custodial parent is still responsible for paying child support to whomever the child goes to. There is no reason the death of a parent should terminate the other parent's child support obligation.
Because you are not married and filed for child support. You have to pay child support to one parent and that has to be to the one with custody. If you both had 50/50 custody it could look differently but you only have visitation.
They can't simply "give the child to you." You need to return to the court and have the custody order modified so you'll have legal custody. It will go easier if the current custodial parent consents to the modification. At that time the current support order should be terminated and you can request child support if you wish.
The new "Mother" has nothing to do with the communion between her husband and his ex-wife, so the answer is no. * A new spouse has no legal standing in regards to non biological children, regardless of the issue. The biological father would have to be the one to file a suit to have the child support order enforced.
I take it you want to terminate your child support, and you should be able to do so. However, you will need to go to court to get this done.
A parent who is receiving public assistance (including SSI) should not be ordered to pay support.
This depends on the circumstances. Frequently custodial fathers are ordered to pay child support in order for the mother t afford a place to have her children visit her.
Yes, unless the non-custodial parent gets custody. In that case the non-custodial parent must file a motion to terminate the child support order. The child support should be paid to whoever has custody of the child. If it's not the non-custodial parent then the child support order should be modified to reflect the party that should receive the child support payments. You have to pay for your child so you have to pay to the one who has custody while the other parent is in prison. If the state has custody you will pay the state.
If the question refers to having a court order enforced the interested party should contact the child support enforcement agency in the state where they reside. If there is no existing order of support the custodial parent or legal guardian should file a lawsuit against the non custodial parent(s) in the court of jurisdiction in the county and state where they reside.
Most states do not allow a child to collect back support as an adult. Although the right to child support belongs to the child, support is payable to the custodial parent to assist in the care and upbringing of that child. If the custodial parent did not receive that support, then she (or he) made contributions that should have come from the other parent, and the right to collect the back support belongs to her.
i believe so
In such a case, the non-custodial father should prepare to begin paying child support.
No, that alone is not a reason to terminate custody. The non-custodial parent should be paying child support.
Of course. Unless the non-custodial parent takes sole custody, the non-custodial parent is still responsible for paying child support to whomever the child goes to. There is no reason the death of a parent should terminate the other parent's child support obligation.
Child support arrears should always be established in the court that issued the child support order because once established they do not go away. The custodial parent should stay on top of the case and continue to pursue the matter in court.
no, but depending on time, support can be adjusted or stopped. In Missouri, after 30 days, it stops.
The CP's marriage should not affect the NCP's child support obligation.