There are two ways of looking at this question.
Points in favour of abolishing them:-
� *The approach of present examination systems means the beginning of fear, tension, anxiety and stress in the minds of the students under which if a student doesn't performs according to his/her parents expectations may lead to students even taking the extreme step of ending their life by doing suicide.
� *Some people also think that exams are not a reliable test of gauging the ability of the students as luck plays a major role.
� *Present examination system encourage cramming, unnecessary expenditure on help-books and also encourage private tuition which has resulted in mushrooming of a large number of tuition shops in every city and even small towns by inexperienced persons.
� *The present examination system doesn't specify the exact criteria for how the marks are given to students.
(No one can deny that external factors can sometimes influence the distribution of marks-- like whether the teacher was in an angry mood over something in his/her personal life, or whether the teacher was upset with the class and giving a test to punish them.
� *The pressure of performing well is so much that if the student has not studied up to the required standards, he/she even sometimes uses unfair means in the examination hall to copy from a near sitting intelligent student and get good marks.
Others have also said:
School examinations should be abolished because:
Better alternatives include:
But those in favour of school examinations say they serve a useful purpose. Thus, they should not be abolished because:
School examinations should be abolished because:
Better alternatives include:
School examinations should not be abolished because:
Yes, because it shows how much you have improved or need improving in certain areas of an subject. It also shows who is smarter than another like in the HSC you need a certain ATAR to get into the university in the subject you want to get in for.
Yes, just as soon as your teachers learn how to use telepathy to read your mind and make certain that you have learned everything that you need to learn.
Whether or not public examinations should be abolished depends on personal opinion. Some people do not believe these exams properly reflect the student's knowledge.
s ,the xamination should be abolished.
because they suck!
yes
Yes they should be but that is my opinion
yes as it is a waste of time
Because they are an indication of how much the of the material being taught, that the pupil has absorbed and been able to recall.
no it should not be abolished
No, exams sudn't b abolished. If der r no exams most ppl won't study or wud b 2 lazy 2 study and those who wud study won't b able 2 analyise themselves.
capital punishment should be abolished in the U.S.
No competitive exams should not be abolished.there are so many reasons. ->it the only reliable instrument ->By this way we choose the right eligilible candidate ->one can only work hard to pass these examinations. suppose we abolish competitive examinations then there is no way to choose the knowledgeable candidate The element of competition is omni(everywhere) In this way of competition many persons are reaching high position.If we abolish competitive examinations then the environment would be hopeless CAN EVER MONKEY AND DONKEY ARE EQUAL? So i strongly recomment competitive examinations -by ria
Trokosi should be abolished because it infringes on the girls right
Trokosi should be abolished because it infringes on the girls right
Trokosi should be abolished because it infringes on the girls right
Yes, it should be abolished all over the world including the Islamic Countries.
it should be abolished cause kids cant express themselve p.s. to ms.t