This question asks an opinionated answer and will receive both positive and negative comments; with that in mind the answer is segregated to reflect both points of view:
Yes they should, because of:
- Executive orders should be eliminated outright; they are treated as 'laws' by enforcement and are intended to bypass the representative portion of government (elimination of a constitutional part of government from the law making process). The first executive orders could not effect citizens in the United States (1917) - this was removed in 1933, when executive orders were issued as "law" under FDR.
No they should not, because of:
- (no entries as of yet, please remove this line when a negative is added)