Shakespeare could certainly write stories of romance. Romeo and Juliet is the classic romantic tragedy (although he also wrote Antony and Cleopatra), and Much Ado about Nothing is the classic romantic comedy (although all the comedies had a love story in them). Some of his late comedies are called Romances because they have fairy tale like plots. On the other hand, he also wrote plays with no love stories at all. And if the question refers to the point of view of the Romantic Movement of the early nineteenth century, no, Shakespeare's work does not reflect that perspective. Finally, we can only talk about Shakespeare's work; his own personality is shrouded in mystery.
No.
In British History, Victorian describes the period of Queen Victoria's reign which was from 1837 to 1901.
William Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616, long before Queen Victoria.
No. Shakespeare did not write novels, just plays and poetry. The novel was a new and experimental form in Shakespeare's day, and there wasn't much money in it. Shakespeare was a writer who made his living by writing and didn't have much time for literary frivolity.
No. The Edwardian period in British history describes the reign of King Edward VII of Great Britain and Ireland, from 1901 to 1910. Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616.
Victorian Lace was named after her mother.
victorian melodrama started in the 12th century
Susanna Shakespeare was a girl. So was Judith Shakespeare. Hamnet Shakespeare was a boy though.
The ones we know about were his mother, Mary Arden Shakespeare, his sisters Anne Shakespeare and Joan Shakespeare Hart, his wife Anne Hathaway Shakespeare, and his daughters Susanna Shakespeare Hall and Judith Shakespeare Quiney.
William Shakespeare's mother's name was Mary Shakespeare
He didn't, really. Some highly pretentious authors, like Harold Bloom, have claimed that he did, but what Bloom is claiming is that Shakespeare invented Victorian literary criticism, which is not only ridiculous but impossible. With Shakespeare, people take their own ideas to the plays and find them reflected there and articulated better than they could articulate them themselves. Shakespeare, in his own words, "holds the mirror up to nature" but he does not create nature. He did not create Harold Bloom's Victorian outlook on literature, but when Bloom looks at Shakespeare, he finds his outlook reflected back to him, and imagines that Shakespeare must have invented it.
Victoria Jane Goodwin has written: 'The pre-raphaelite brotherhood's understanding of Shakespeare in the context of Victorian society'
Rosalina sounds like a variant on Rosalind, which is Spanish in origin. The name Rosalind was used in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
Shakespeare was not a Stuart because that was the surname of the royal family later in his life. He lived partly in the Stuart period which was the period 1603-1714. He was not a Victorian because that would be someone who lived during the reign of Queen Victoria 1837-1901
Shakespeare wrote at least thirty-eight plays and two narrative poems which all tell stories. In fact, the plays often tell two or more stories at the same time. You can find summaries of the stories in an encyclopedia or a book about Shakespeare or in a book like Lamb's Tales from Shakespeare which tells them in a form designed for Victorian children.
Robert Sawyer has written: 'Victorian appropriations of Shakespeare' -- subject(s): Adaptations, Appreciation, Criticism and interpretation, English literature, History, History and criticism, Influence
If not Victorian, then Victorian design (If you want to keep the house in period).
A list of Victorian desserts includes A list of Victorian desserts Includes Victorian Applesauce Cake, Victorian Benne Seed Cookies, Victorian Cucumber Sandwichvictorian Apricot Sherbet, And Victorian Cranberry Muffins.
There are some Victorian era saints but not all saints are Victorian.
victorian
No. William Shakespeare lived from 1564 to 1616. Queen Victoria ruled from 1837 to 1901, and her reign is what could be called "Victorian times." Basically you are at least 220 years off. Shakespeare's death was as long ago when Queen Victoria came to the throne as Queen Victoria's coronation is now. It's like saying that Washington was the President of the US on September 11, 2001.
No, for two reasons: 1. Shakespeare's Hamlet is a play, which means it has to be acted to be understood. Lamb's is a story, and can only be read, not acted. 2. Shakespeare's Hamlet is a play for adults, with a number of adult themes. It is so full of nuances that its possibilities have not been exhausted in 400 years. Lamb's story is a story for Victorian kiddies, with all of the complex issues and dirty stuff edited out.