South Carolina was a proprietary colony until the colonist got tired of the way the Lords Proprietors were "handling the business". They (the colonist ) petitioned the King to take control of South Carolina as a Royal colony. He did in 1719.
charter colony
The Carolina Colony was originally a proprietary colony, however after disputes of power and ownership arose the crown split the colony into what is now known as North and South Carolina.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province_of_South_Carolina
The government in colonial South Carolina is a proprietery colony.They were proprietary like North Carolina, but later became a royal colony.
no, they were proprietary colonies
yes because it was a very poor city at that time
South Carolina is a state. and the colony isn't.
The South Carolina Colony, or Province of South Carolina, was originally part of the Province of Carolina, which was chartered in 1663.
To the south of South Carolina would have been southern Georgia and Spanish Florida. However, the legal division between Georgia and Florida was highly disputed during Colonial times. According to the date of the map, you could find either Georgia (English Colony) or Florida (under Spanish control).
South Carolina
The colony north of Georgia was South Carolina.
it was a Proprietary and a Royal Colony. -Clitorisandra
It is a proprietary colony.