answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

He was a strict constructionist. He viewed interpretted the Constituion narrowly. Strict constructionist were also called antiFederalists.

User Avatar

Adolfo Mosciski

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

He was a strict constructionist. In fact, one of the famous ironies of his presidency was that despite being a strict constructionist, he made the Louisiana Purchase, which was an act opposed by other strict constructionists who did not believe that the U.S. government had the power to take such an action.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

He was a strict constructionist but during one of his terms he did a lot of loose constructionist thing, like buying Louisiana. But he is a strict constructionist and he lead all the others, against Alexander Hamilton who was the opposite of him and was a loose constructionist and lead that party.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

once put into power they became more lenient with their constructionist values, but generally speaking---yes he was

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Yeah, and he still is... He actually published a theory on it

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Thomas Jefferson did loose constructionist like things, But Thomas was a strict constructionist.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

This is a statement and homework given to you to answer. We don't do homework and I know your teacher is looking for YOUR response from this prompt, not ours. So get to work.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

a strict constructionist

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

strict constitution

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Loose construction or strict construction what was Thomas Jefferson's view on the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did Alexander Hamilton's and Thomas jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?

Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.


How did Alexander Hamilton and and Thomas Jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution differ?

Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.


How did Alexander hamilton and thomas jeffersons views towards the interpretation of the constitution differ?

Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.


How did hamiltons and jeffersons views toward the interpretation of the constitution different?

Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.


What are the loose and strict constructions of the Constitution and who favored each?

It's your interpretation of the constitution. The philosophy that allows narrow constitutional interpretation is called strict construction and the philosophy of broad constitutional interpretation is called loose construction. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison favored the strict constructions, and Alexander Hamilton favored the loose construction.


What is the difference between strict construction and broad construction?

Strict construction takes a narrow view of laws, statutes, and the constitution. Broad construction takes a broad view of laws, statutes, and the constitution.


What is the Difference Between loose Constitution and strict Constitution of the Constitution?

A strict interpretation of the Constitution states that the government of the United States holds only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution. A loose interpretation of the Constitution posits that the government of the United States hold all powers that are not specifically denied to it by the Constitution.


Which early politician believed in strict construction?

Both Senator Daniel Webster and President Thomas Jefferson were strict constructionists who did not like the federal government's attempts to bend the Constitution to its expedient needs.


Strict construction of the Constitution?

Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.


What is the difference between loose construction and strict construction of the Constitution.?

Strict construction meant that those interpreting it thought that that the government should only have powers that were expressly stated in the constitution. Like, it shouldn't stretch the limits or try to do things that the constitution didn't say specifically were ok to do.


What is the Difference Between Strict Construction and Loose Construction?

Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbidStrict construction- people who favor strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.


How was john marshall's interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jeffersons?

John Marshall had a loose interpretation of the Constitution while Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict interpretation of it. John Marshall strongly believed in the elastic clause (the necessary and proper clause) which meant: "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof". So he thought that if a law was needed, then it could be added and adjusted into the Constitution and one didn't have to stick to the exact words of the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson supposedly had a strict construction of the Constitution, but his actions such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Act showed loose interpretations because neither one of those were written in the Constitution. He very rarely showed a strict interpretation where he stuck directly to the Constitution, so they really weren't that different in views even though in titles they were.