I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
It came to depend on trade.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
fd
no it is not
yes
The Ligures were divided in three social classes, the Druids or Priests, the Military equipped with chariots, bows, spears, shields and mystical necklaces, and the Working class. A king ruled them all.
There was a clear distinction in the types of jobs done by people from different social classes.
A caste is any of the hereditary social classes of traditional Hindu society. An example of a caste class is the Shudra, who were the unskilled laborers.
The economy was based on harvesting, production and trade of economically valuable products. The politics was based on social aspects. Social classes arose largely from economic status.
Stewart Clegg has written: 'Power in organization theory' 'Class, politics and the economy' -- subject(s): Capitalism, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Social classes, Social classes
The division of society into social classes based on who does or does not own property.
I don't know I am asking my self the same question that's why I googled it