Are boxer briefs better then briefs?

Answer 1

In my opinion, i like boxers better. If a guy wears briefs, it just creeps me out!

i agree, because boxers are better and briefs just squeeze your balls in which can be pain. boxers are better. they let everything hang but what I'm saying is boxers are awesome

Answer 2

I think briefs are better looking because boxer briefs can be uncomfortable.

Your question is best answered by how preferences are shaped once you wear each style for a period of time.

The key here is that every manufacturer makes their products just a little different from one another. For instance, Hanes wears differently than Fruit-of-the-Loom and they both wear differently from, say, Calvin Klein.

Generally though, briefs usually are designed to support whereas boxer briefs are supposed to be a little looser. However, some manufacturers create their boxer briefs basically as a brief with a longer-length leg, while others give a more generous boxer fit that looks like a brief with a longer-length leg.

For looser boxer-style boxer briefs, try Fruit-of-the-Loom, Puritan (Wal-Mart), or Joe Boxer (K-Mart). For a closer-fit, Hanes and Life (Wal-Mart) are better choices. No need to pay for the designers because their wear longevity for the price you pay is really out-of-balance (i.e. they don't last as long as the ones mentioned above that are a fraction of the designers).

It's purely down to choice, and the best person to choose is the one who is going to wear them. Buy a cheap pair of each style and see which they prefer.