answersLogoWhite

0

What are some proofs against the Biblical flood?

Updated: 8/16/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

Answer

  • The atmospheric pressure is 14.7 lbs per square inch at sea level. If the entire atmosphere was composed of nothing but water vapor, it could only condense to the weight of 14.7 lbs of water above a square inch. There are 8.4 lbs of water in a gallon. Two gallons of water weighs MORE than 14.7 lbs, and there are 231 cubic inches in a gallon. So an entire atmosphere of nothing but (super saturated) water vapor could only condense into a column less than 462 inches high (two gallons) of liquid water. That is a little under 40 feet. Not NEARLY enough to inundate the earth--and at that everything above it would asphyxiate in hard vacuum before the surface water froze from lack of atmospheric insulation. Water vapor is actually about 37% LIGHTER than dry air, so factoring that actually yields only 25 feet of water covering the earth--at most.
  • The greatest rainfall ever recorded was 1.5 inches per minute, or 2160 inches per day. This unsustainable rate would yield 7200 feet of rain over 40 days, still not enough to cover any peaks 8000 feet or higher. Besides, as noted it cannot possibly rain that much everywhere at once. Water has to come from someplace. Rain is the result of one moist warm air mass meeting a cold air mass, so the greatest rainfall occurs along the boundary. If it rained everywhere simultaneously, it would have to quit once 25 feet of precipitation had been reached--however long that took--as noted above.
  • Rain comes primarily from the sea and would drain back into the sea.

    The Bible vaguely mentions water from the deep - under the earth - but there is no evidence of any such water ever existed. Water from near earth's mantle would also possess mantle heat. It would vaporize to steam as it reached the surface, just as hot springs, fumeroles, and volcanic eruptions emit steam.

    Nor could we say where this huge volume of water went at the end of the Flood. Where is it?

  • The Judaic Flood story can be seen to be based on the Gilgamesh Flood. So, if either story is correct, it must be the older one. Therefore the Sumerian gods must be regarded as the true gods, not the God of the Jews.
  • There is also no evidence of a mass-extinction 4400 odd years ago in the fossil record. It is also genetically virtually impossible for a species to bounce back from a handful of members, let alone all life on earth. They would all suffer what's known as a genetic bottleneck because there are insufficient members of the species for natural selection to sustain their biological complexity over long periods of time.
  • No genuine archaeological evidence has been found, of any great flood event during the last 5,000 years, or of any global flood in the past half billion years.
  • Similarly, populations in the American South 5000 years ago--long before the flood--begin cultivating sunflowers and marsh elders, and continue to do so long after the flood is said to have occurred. People speaking a variation of Algonquin settled in North Eastern Canada 5000 years ago, surviving until modern times. Head-Smashed-In-Buffalo-Jump in Alberta was first used by the Blackfoot tribe 6000 years ago. Tribal members drove buffalo between rocky cairns off a cliff, and continued doing so up to first contact with Europeans. Flood creationists must have us believe neither the cairns nor cliff were damaged by the flood, and that people and buffalo completely eliminated by the flood migrated back to Alberta to reestablish the same practices of their long dead, unrelated predecessors (NOT ancestors). Mesoamericans develop maize about 6000 years ago, while Peruvians develop beans and squash. Flood creationists want us to believe the people who developed these agricultural products were utterly destroyed by the Noachian Flood, and completely unrelated people bearing uncanny skeletal similarities migrated back to the same region shortly thereafter with seeds saved for maize and squash--not used at that time anywhere else in the world--to reestablish the preceding agricultural practices.
  • Flood creationists apparently want us to believe citizens of Babel migrated to North America, South America, Australia, Europe, China, India, and elsewhere to adopt certain unique customs and practices, who were subsequently utterly destroyed, only to be rapidly replaced by completely unrelated descendants of Noah to the same geographic regions post-flood and adopt identical customs, cultural practices, art and architectural styles, and distinguishing skeletal features.

  • The ancients knew that animals would drown, but they apparently didn't know that plants would too. So, the Bible did not require Noah to collect seeds and spoors from millions of species and subspecies of trees, plants, ferns, grasses and so on, documenting exactly where each came from, then going back after the Flood to plant, water and care for each seed until it was viable.
  • No species unique to one geologic strata are found in layers above or below that strata. Instead, both flora and fauna are sequenced to their respective layers based on the epoch in which they lived. While the joke about flowering plants and trees all running to higher ground (Cenozoic strata) to escape encroaching Noachian flood water is amusing, the notion of hydrologic sorting of taxa itself doesn't hold water. Plants and animals of wide ranging volumes and densitites are found in all strata. The distinguishing characteristics are the relative ages--NOT any features subject to sorting by random flood action. Moreover, geologic strata are often separated by undisturbed layers of volcanic ash, which is fortunate because these ash layers generally contain isotopes which reveal absolute ages
  • Modern shipwrights constructed an enormous (400 ft) wooden vessel, the Wyoming, using the best science available to 20th century engineers. They failed to properly account for the mild twisting to which this ship would be subjected and it foundered and its 14 member crew was lost. Flood creationists want us to believe that Noah, having never built a ship in his life, constructed a much larger wooden vessel on his first attempt which withstood cataclysmic heaving seas capable of carving meandering Grand Canyon channels and deposting enormous quantities of sediment around the globe. (Argument credited to Bill Nye vs Ken Ham, February 4th, 2014).
  • How did all Australian marsupials happen to end up back in Australia, the land of their origin, while leaving no trace of their subsequent migration from Mt. Ararat in the Middle East?

+++

Most of the sedimentary and tectonic processes were complete for all practical purposes millions of years before the Biblical period - or more accurately, these processes are so slow in human terms that the coastlines of the world we see now are not significantly different from their form 3000 years ago.

There is insufficient water on the planet for a 'Waterworld' style transgression.

The highest sea-levels were in the Cretaceous, approaching 100 million years ago, during a long warm period, and reached about 450ft above present level. This was many millions of years before Man appeared on Earth, and the oceans and continents were of different shapes and arrangements than now.

The Noah legend is certainly odd, and may have been oral-tradition legend based on some major but purely-local flood that devastated a particular tribe, but a total inundation is just not possible. Equally legendary is the notion of a vast, natural underground resevoir or aquifer capable of holding such a huge volume of water. So where has the water gone since the end of the Cretaceous 65Ma? Simple: it is held as ice on mountains and the polar land-ice sheets; and even more was held thus during the glacial phases of the present Ice Age! (Note: land-ice only. Melting the Earth's sea-ice such as the North Polar Ice-Cap alone, would not change the sea-level.)

All you need is one verified refutation to debunk the myth and they are numerous. For instance the Egyptians, who were flooded all the time, were not wiped out nor do they even record a flood during that time.

There is also the problem of genetic diversity. No species can survive with a single couple. if their children mate the progeny will quickly become so mutated they can't be viable parents.

Regardless of your faith it must be acknowledged that the flood myth is exactly that; as any educated theologian will tell you.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

A few ideas:

  • The Judaic Flood story can be seen to be based on the Gilgamesh Flood. So, if either story is correct, it must be the older one. Therefore the Sumerian gods must be regarded as the true gods, not the God of the Jews.
  • No genuine archaeological evidence has been found, of any great flood event during the last 5,000 years.
  • The Flood would have no purpose unless it flooded the entire earth to the mountain tops, but there is not enough water on earth to flood every continent to the top of the highest mountains. Forty days of the heaviest rain imaginable would scarecely make a difference and, in any case, rain comes from the sea and would quicky drain back into the sea.

    The Bible vaguely mentions water from the deep - under the earth - but there never was any such water. In any case it would have to defy the laws of gravity to reach the surface, and to stay there for a whole year.

    Nor could we say where this huge volume of water went to at the end of the Flood. Where is it?

  • We now know from Egyptian records that the Egyptian civilisation continued undisturbed right through the period when the Flood was supposed to have occurred. Not only does that prove that the Flood did not reach Egypt (and therefore Africa), but one must wonder why Noah didn't simply walk to safety in Egypt rather than going to the trouble of building an ark and collecting millions of animals, birds, lizards, insects and so on.
  • The ancients knew that animals would drown, but they apparently didn't know that plants would too. So, the Bible did not require Noah to collect seeds and spoors from millions of species and subspecies of trees, plants, ferns, grasses and so on, documenting exactly where each came from, then going back after the Flood to plant, water and care for each seed until it was viable.
  • The Bible says that Noah lived for a further 350 years after the Flood. Having personally talked to God, been rescued from the greatest disaster in human history, and being the direct ancestor of every living person, it is inconceivable that no written record exists of the subsequent life of this great man. No one sought Noah's advice, and even the worship of the God who had saved Noah had totally disappeared by the time of Abraham, who knew nothing of his supposedly still-living ancestor.
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are some proofs against the Biblical flood?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are some differences between the glacier theories and Biblical accounts of the Flood?

Well first of all one is thousands of years apart from the other.


You want to find Bible quotes about Biblical battles you know there are some in the Old Testament what are some of the verses?

Against the Canaanites, Numbers 21:3. Against the Amorites, Numbers 21:34-35. Against the Midianites, 31:1-54.


What is there when there is a flood?

People suffer and some get killed by a flood.


What are the proofs that God was indeed with the people of Moses?

A:There is no proof. We have the evidence of a book that some believe was written by Moses, but which scholars say was written centuries later about an event that probably did not occur. Whether or not the biblical account is true, is a matter of faith, not something that can be proven.


How long was it from Noah to Abraham?

A:The Book of Genesis says that Noah was born some 890 years before Abraham was born. He lived another 350 years after the Flood, therefore living until Abraham was some 60 years old, yet he played no further part in the biblical story. He did not use his personal acquaintance with God to argue against the rise of new religions, and Abraham was not aware that he had a living ancestor who could have provided testimony for his God. Neither Abraham nor any other national leader kept in touch with Noah nor sought his advice on any matter. It is as if he ceased to exist once he had fulfilled his biblical role of surviving the Flood.


What is the evidence for and against the flood in the Book of Genesis?

Evidence for the biblical FloodThere is no actual evidence for the Flood. Some apologists claim that the fossils that scientists say were laid down over many millions of years were actually the skeletons of animals and plants killed suddenly by the Flood. However, scientists could never accept this because the fossils are laid down in predictable layers, many of which can be dated by the rocks in which they are found. If so many animals were killed by rising flood waters, we should expect no layering, or at least none that made sense.There is circumstantial evidence that a traumatic flood event did occur somewhere in or near the Middle East region, because of the many similar legends of a great flood. Ian Wilson (Before the Flood) demonstrates that this is almost certainly a folk memory of a flood event now known to have occurred in 5600 BCE, when the Mediterranean Sea breached the Bosporus and flooded the fertile, low-lying area that is now the Black Sea.Evidence against the biblical FloodThere is not enough water in the world to cover the earth to the top of the mountains. Local floods occur when water evaporates from the ocean and unusual falls of rain temporarily cover an area of land. But what falls in one area (the land) must come from another area (the sea), and gravity soon returns the flood waters back to the sea. There are too many other scientific proofs that a world-wide flood never occurred, to deal with here. At the time the Flood is supposed to have occurred and wiped out all life on earth, around 3000 BCE, the ancient Egyptian civilisation (among others) continued undisturbed. Nothing happened that disturbed the lifestype of the Egyptian people.The Bible itself provides evidence that the story is Noah's Flood is, at least in part, a literary creation, because there are two distinct and complete Flood stories woven together. Scholars have separated the two stories, to show that there are important differences between them - for example in one story there was no distinction between clean and unclean animals and the Flood covered the earth for forty days, while the other says that Noah took two of each unclean animal and seven of each clean animal into the Ark, and the Flood covered the earth for a whole year.


Are all silver eagles uncirculated?

Most are uncirculated, and some are proofs.


What are some biblical parallels in Cry the Beloved Country?

Some biblical parallels in "Cry, the Beloved Country" include themes of forgiveness, redemption, justice, and the impact of sin and injustice on society. The character of Absalom Kumalo can be seen as a parallel to the biblical figure of Absalom, and the story's overall message of hope and reconciliation echoes biblical teachings of love and compassion.


Who are the biblical characters who had sinned against god but who acknowledged their sin and returned to gad?

Some: king David, king Manassiah, prophet Johna, apostle Peter


How many years were there between the flood and sodom and Gomorrah?

According to tradition, the Flood was in 2104 BCE, and Sodom was destroyed in 1713 BCE. See also:Evidence of the Flood


Is The Bible original?

There may be some biblical accounts that are based on stories in older scriptures. Scholars say that the first creation story in Genesis 1:1-2:4a is based on a Babylonian creation myth that the Jews learnt during the Babylonian Exile. The biblical story of Noah's Flood is believed to be based on the story of Utnapishtim in the Gilgamesh Epic of Mesopotamia.


Did Jose Rizal and Josephine Bracken get married?

Some believed that they were married, but there were no proofs of their wedding.