You are asking for a lot in one question! For thermal reactors there are replies available. Ask 'What are the advantages of nuclear fission power' and see the reply, there is also in the links section another reply to 'What are the disadvantages of nuclear fission power', so there is no need to repeat these.
Reactors specially designed for breeding are aimed at either producing plutonium from uranium 238, or uranium 233 from thorium. Various theoretical designs are possible, the difficulties are in the practical engineering, and of course the fuel separation which would be required to obtain the bred fuel. The most used design so far is the liquid metal (sodium or sodium/potassium mixture) fast reactor, which can breed plutonium from fast neutron capture in uranium 238. A fast reactor, that is one where the neutrons from fission are not slowed down by a moderator, is going to breed more Pu than a thermal one (with a moderator). Therefore water reactors are not suitable, as water moderates neutrons. If you know about chemistry, you will know how reactive sodium is, and if it is hot it is even more so, so it is potentially dangerous although the liquid metal does not have to be pressurised. But it has to circulate through heat exchangers to give its energy up to a steam/water circuit for power generation, so any leak there will result in water ingress to the reactor.
I think that at present there is no great incentive to press ahead with breeders, as PWR and BWR designs have been developed to be reliable workhorses and there is no shortage of uranium for enrichment. This could change in the future and breeders could come back, but mostly the impetus has gone, prototypes have been shutdown and building programs have been abandoned, though theoretical studies continue in some countries. India seems to be interested in the thorium cycle, but again I wonder if this will become reality, especially now with the US-India deal for co-operation, which will I expect deliver US water reactor technology to India.
To learn more see Wikipedia 'Fast Breeder Reactors', and also Dounreay PFR
A breeder reactor generates (in a way) new fuel, sometimes more fuel than it uses, by converting non-fissionable isotopes into fissionable isotopes, through neutron capture.
ADVANTAGES 1. releases large amounts of energy from small amounts of mass 2. very efficient 3. fuel lasts a long time 4. convert nuclear energy into thermal energy DISADVANTAGES 1. they are very expensive 2. they are hard to keep up 3. the waste is hard to get rid of
There are 104 operating nuclear reactors in the US and at least 400 world wide.
I hate nuclear weapons. There are only disadvantages. Ever heard of Chernobyl? Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Sellafield? Three Mile Island, a.k.a Harrisburg? Nukes suck! So many poor babies born with birth defects due to idiotic humans! Ugg! Thanks for ur Q though! :-)
It is a robot that is used in radioactive areas and can carry over 200lbs. it is used to remove nuclear reactors.
You can't compare and contrast nuclear reactors and breeder reactors, any more than you can compare a lion with a mammal. A lion is one example of many mammals; a breeder reactor is just one example of many types of nuclear reactor.
Most nuclear reactors are thermal-neutron reactors. A few fast breeder reactors have been built, but not many.
Thermal Breeder Reactors use moderators but Fast Breeder Reactors don't use moderator.
The breeder reactor produce more fissile fuel than what is consumed while this is not the case for other nuclear reactors.
You can't compare and contrast nuclear reactors and breeder reactors, any more than you can compare a lion with a mammal. A lion is one example of many mammals; a breeder reactor is just one example of many types of nuclear reactor.
They all use nuclear fission
No, plutonium is obtained in all the types of nuclear reactors.
A breeder reactor generates (in a way) new fuel, sometimes more fuel than it uses, by converting non-fissionable isotopes into fissionable isotopes, through neutron capture.
Not as fuel, but it can be used in breeder reactors as breeding material to make fissile Uranium-233.
They're mostly the same, except that nuclear reactors aimed at breeding more fissile material use expensive primary coolant instead of cheap water.
natural nuclear reactors are not possible now as the concentration of fissionable Uranium-235 in unenriched natural Uranium ore is too low.
Nuclear fusion reactors do not exist yet as we don't know how to build them. All nuclear reactors are nuclear fission reactors.