price ceilings causes black markets to develop.the best example being of rationing where in suppliers start selling the materials meant for ration at higher prices illegaly.
Price ceilings do NOT cause black markets, as price ceilings set the price lower than would be "natural" in a pure capitalistic system, and black markets appear only when the "normal" price of a good is more than what people are willing to pay for it. Black markets also tend to appear when rationing is in place, but price ceilings, while they are often used in conjunction with rationing, do NOT require rationing to be implemented.
THe major consequences of price ceilings are that the producers of the goods under the ceiling are not getting the full compensation they are due. This interrupts the normal feedback loop between price and availability (demand vs supply) that is critical for a capitalistic system to have to achieve "optimal" efficiency. Here are some of the consequences for that lack of efficiency:
A good example of the harm that poorly-done price ceilings can have is the current situation of petrol (gasoline) for personal vehicles in Iran. The price is set far below "natural" (on the order of $1/gallon). This means that people have very little incentive to chose alternate forms of transportation (such as bicycling, mass transport, etc.), and will chose to drive in many situations that are for convenience only, not economically useful. They thus have a far higher gasoline consumption per capita than many comparable economies. Iranian gasoline producers receive huge subsidies from the government, but still barely enough to cover the cost difference between production costs and retail price. This means that the Iranian petroleum industry cannot invest in any new refineries or technology, leaving the whole industry stagnant and inefficient. Finally, the massive subsidies that the Iranian government must pay to the petroleum producers (just to keep them in business) is a significant drag on their national budget, taking money from other services.
I am not sure if there are any advantages because the end result is a deadweight.
On the contrary, there are many advantages to price ceilings. One is that it lowers the cost for the consumers and therefore encorages consumption. Therefore the demand for that good or service will increase. This is a type of government intervention used to correct market faliure. However a price ceiling must always be put below the equilibrium point or it will have no effect. If the government uses innacurate information, then this can lead to government faliure.
Price floor is a minimum and price ceiling is a maximum.
A price ceiling is characterized by a price set below the current market price.
A price ceiling is the legal maximum price that may be charged for a particular good or service.
A price ceiling prevents a price from rising above the ceiling. It represents an upper limit on the price of something. If wheat has a price ceiling of $400 per metric tonne, $400 is the highest amount any what supplier can charge. If the market price for wheat is below the ceiling, say $200 in this example, then the ceiling has no effect on prices; the ceiling is not binding. If the market price is higher than the ceiling, supply and demand cannot reach equilibrium and there is a shortage in the commodity. Artificially low prices result in demand that exceeds supply. The price, however, remains stuck at the ceiling.
A price floor can cause a surplus while a price ceiling can cause a shortage but not always.
lowers the supply of good creates a shortage
Price floor is a minimum and price ceiling is a maximum.
Price floor is a minimum and price ceiling is a maximum.
A price ceiling is characterized by a price set below the current market price.
A price ceiling is the legal maximum price that may be charged for a particular good or service.
Binding Versus Non-Binding price ceilingsA price ceiling can be set above or below the free-market equilibrium price. For a price ceiling to be effective, it must differ from the free market price. In the graph at right, the supply and demand curves intersect to determine the free-market quantity and price. The dashed line represents a price ceiling set above the free-market price, called a non-binding price ceiling. In this case, the ceiling has no practical effect. The government has mandated a maximum price, but the market price is established well below that.In contrast, the solid green line is a price ceiling set below the free market price, called a binding price ceiling. In this case, the price ceiling has a measurable impact on the market.
A price floor can cause a surplus while a price ceiling can cause a shortage but not always.
A price ceiling prevents a price from rising above the ceiling. It represents an upper limit on the price of something. If wheat has a price ceiling of $400 per metric tonne, $400 is the highest amount any what supplier can charge. If the market price for wheat is below the ceiling, say $200 in this example, then the ceiling has no effect on prices; the ceiling is not binding. If the market price is higher than the ceiling, supply and demand cannot reach equilibrium and there is a shortage in the commodity. Artificially low prices result in demand that exceeds supply. The price, however, remains stuck at the ceiling.
A price floor is the minimum price set by the government where as a price ceiling is the maximum price sellers can charge for a good or service.
case study about price ceiling
The government may impose a price ceiling in order to increase supply.
Usury law put a ceiling on interest rate