No, a process cannot be inherently bad. Only what is done with that process can define it as good or bad in that context.<<<<< THIS ANSWER IS WRONG!!!!!!!!!
CLONING IS BAD WE LOSE OUR SOULS AND WILL SUFFER A LONG AND PAINFUL EXISTANCE IN HELL!!!
Cloning is bad because clones are not to be salves and we don't have the material to make cloning possible.
Here are some reasons why
Cloning is trying to replace something if it died. For example scientists are trying to figure out how to clone children. They think that when a baby dies they can clone it and replace it. But it doesn't work that way.
some people think cloning is not good because its "playing god" but scientists believe that they can stop heart attacks by injecting helathy heart cells in the damaged heart therefore fixing it!! its kinda pointless kinda not but its ur opinion u decide!!
a bad thing about clonning in plants is that the all population can be wiped out if resistance breaks down which is a direct loss of productions. And in human,the clonned person dosent have the chance to reproduce again.From my own opinion person may not have the chance to go through genetic modifications during fetal stage to eliminate disease causing genes
Animal cloning is bad for the environment for a few reasons. Animal cloning changes the life cycle and can cause mutant animals. It also messes with the balance of nature and can harm the organism.
Things could be mutated and so on.... How would you feel about eating cloned beef and drinking cloned milk? But cloning isn't all that bad.
more than 90% of cloening fails to be successful
Ian Wilmut did not call cloning cloning. He was the professor that had cloned Dolly (Andrew) the sheep. Johnny
Cloning is a type of asexual reproduction.
When a clone is made without the use of artificial cloning. Natural cloning: Twins, mitosis, asexual reproduction Artificial cloning: SCNT, therepuetic + reproductive cloning.
Cloning is controlled because of opposition by people of religion. They say that cloning is wrong, and that we should not be tampering with life.
Replacement cloning is a theoretical possibility, and would be a combination of therapeutic and reproductive cloning. Replacement cloning would entail the replacement of an extensively damaged, failed, or failing body through cloning followed by whole or partial brain transplant.
A good Christians view on cloning is no. No cloning.
1. Cloning prevents extinction
Good
yes and no.
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
That it is good.
Because there is more food for you to consume if you clone it and it is good for you some how?
cloning is a very bad thing. in most cloning abilities one of the side effects is that the clone turns bad, half the world is after you and not to mention the clones will be verypowerful.To be very honest, I am against it, but if it is going to help world poverty, by for instance cloning really good food sources, or helping eradicate terrible diseases, then I am all for it
Its bad because it's unnatural. But so are polio vaccines! Cloning parts for people to save their lives could be a good thing!
The good cloning vector should have small size, high copy number, own origin of replication, restriction sites for many restriction enzymes and selectable markers.
Cloning is an interesting technology which, like other technologies, can potentially be used for either good purposes or bad purposes. It also needs a lot more research to achieve its potential either for good or ill.
In general, sticky end cloning and blunt end cloning