What are the cons of the animal rights movement?

It will entirely revolutionize our way of life. For the better, but it will be hard to adjust. If animal liberation is achieved, scientists will no longer have the option to test on animals. Most diets will have to change dramatically. No circuses, no rodeos, no leather, or any usage of animals that does not have their consent.


In present day, the movement currently offends many who believe animals are here for human usage, or believe in human superiority in general. It offends those who are unwilling to change or are just ignorant. Some animal right activists are very blunt, and many of the campaigns are abrasive and crude. The ALF commits arson and strives to damage companies that support animal use.


A previous answer that I changed is false: Animal Liberation and Human Liberation are directly connected. If we all stop eating animals, enough food and land would be more than ten times the amount it would take to feed all the starving people in the world. A cow consumes sixteen times as much food as it produces. Think of all the land currently used for livestock, the polluted waters from the fecal matter, transportation costs, etc.