PCR allows amplification of DNA for a specific gene, after too many cycles of PCR the result will reach saturation, basically meaning all of the DNA has been amplified.
Conventional PCR will basically tell you whether or not a gene is expressed in your sample. This can be done semi-quantitavely if the PCR is performed for a low number of cycles, ie it will tell you whether one sample expresses more of your gene of interest than another sample. The results are seen by separating the PCR products by agarose gel/ethidium bromide electrophoresis.
Real-time PCR will record exactly what cycle of PCR a detectable level of amplified product became detectable, giving a far more accurately quantifiable estimation of gene expression.
Real time PCR is quantitative while conventional PCR is qualitative.
We cannot quantitate the product in case of normal PCR which is possible with real time PCR.
megha
Yes, real time pcr is better because it collects information at the time when there is exponential growth, is easier to detect than regular pcr, and does not require processing afterwards.
its answer is.............................................oh its time for maa lan's party soits answer is khota.
The main points of differences are:(1)Motion Study involves the study of motions on an operation while the time study notes the time involved in carrying out each element of operation.(2)The main aim of Motion Study is to reduce wastage of time and materials scraping the unnecessary movements whereas the time study aims at fixing the standard time for carrying out a job.(3)Time study is not suitable for workers where quality is prime consideration. Motion study is suitable for all types of jobs.
"Conventional electrical currents" are thought of as moving from the Positive pole of a supply to the Negative. Physically this is not what happens, but by the time they figured it out, there was so much literature that they decided to keep it as a convention--since for most purposes it simply does not matter. The electrons actually sneak around the other way--from negative to positive.
Comparative is when u are comparing two things and some key words are compare and contrast where as experimental is when a fair test is designed and u are changing many things but only one at a time
Generally, a molecular clock is used to describe the rate of molecular change over time that tells you when two species, or taxa, have diverged.
Conventional sources of energy have been in use for a long time that usually cause pollution and are exhaustible. Non-conventional sources, meanwhile, are recent sources of energy that are inexhaustible and pollution-free.
You don't. There is no difference in the type of energy, between the "conventional" and "non-conventional" types. What makes energy conventional or non-conventional is the SOURCE - a conventional source being one that has been used for a long time.
Motion does not determine time differences. They are determined by time zones. The difference between FL and CA is 3 hours.
The last time America fought in a conventional war was during World War 1. Conventional wars are the use of warfare that is conducted by using conventional military weapons and battlefield tactics between two or more states in an open confrontation.
elmo :)
8 hours
if it is 10 oclock in newjearsey what time would it be in England
theres no time difference
time diffrence
Similarities : They both tell time, and mark time. Differences : Historical time is more specific, and time interval can be any piece of time in the world.
There is never a time difference between Virginia and New York.
One of the differences between Srilanka and the Maldives is the time. There is 1 half and hour time difference between the two.