0
What was the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Roman Republic was a democratic nation, focused on alliances and trade and military around the Mediterranean Sea. The empire was led by a monarch, or emperor, who (in almost every way) had total control. Usually, they squandered the nation's wealth on personal wars, great palaces, and anything else that came to their desire. The republic made two generals, or consuls, control the military at all times. They owned bits of France, Italy, Greece, North Africa, the Middle East; everywhere the Mediterranean touches. The Roman Empire was more powerful, because there was a lot of military buildup; they were easily the most powerful nation in the world. Take the boundaries of their nation and stretch them. However, crime and corruption and decadence had never been seen in the Western World like that before.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoTechnically there was no difference. The Roman republic was an empire. As soon as Rome expanded and governed territories under Roman law, it became an empire. It was an empire under the republican form of government with elected officials, each responsible for the duties of his office. What is erroneously called the "Roman Empire" is properly called the principate, where one man, usually not elected, ruled. So the empire was first ruled collectively, by the senate, and then singularly, under the principate.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoOriginally, Rome was a republic, in which representatives were elected by the population with the ability to vote, who ran all of Rome. Eventually, the republic was taken over in a coup, establishing an emperor. The democratic republic is referred to as the Roman Republic, while the Rome ruled by the emperor is the Roman Empire.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe Republic was headed by two annually elected consuls who were the heads of state and the army. This was done to prevent personal rule by one man.
The term empire is used by historians to indicate the period that followed the Republic when there was personal rule by one man whom they call the emperor.
This choice of term is confusing because Rome already had developed an empire during the Republic. The term is used both in relation to the territory of the Roman Empire and to rule by one man. To add to the confusion the Romans did not use the term emperor for the personal ruler. They used the term princeps (first man).
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoNone. Rome was already an empire under the republic. An empire is NOT a form of government, it is a large holding of some type. What is falsely called the "Roman empire" is the principate.
This was a form of government in which one man was the responsible leader.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoRome established an empire long before what we call Roman Empire emerged. In the Republican era, assemblies of the people dominated. With Augustus came a power-sharing between the Princeps and the Senate, with the popular assemblies gone.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe difference was only between the head of state. Rome was an empire under the republic. It had territories and provinces under the republic and ruled them under Roman law, That made Rome an empire under the republican form of government. What is commonly called the "empire" was in reality a principate, with one man being the supreme ruler.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoThe main difference is that the Roman Repuclic was run by the people and for the people, while the Roman Empire was run by an emperor.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between Roman public and Roman empire?
There really is no major difference. The Roman Empire was the empire itself, lasting from 27 BCE-476 AD (1453 for the Eastern half, which came to be the Byzantine Empire). In the beginning the Roman empire was an autocracy, headed by emperors. It then later turned into a republic, which is when people use the term Roman Republic or Republic of Rome. This is actually where the modern day type of republic comes from, Rome.
What is the difference between roman republic and Canadian democracy?
They are not comparable. The Roman Republic was an oligarchy, not a democracy.
Who is military and political leader who transformed the roman republic into a empire?
Julius Caesar is the military leader and the dictator who transformed the roman republic into an roman empire. He assumed total power after transforming the republic into the empire.
How did the Roman republic become the Roman empire and the holy Roman empire?
The Holy Roman Empire had nothing to do with the Romans. It was a medieval institution centred around Germany. The Roman republic became an empire by expansion both before and after the Punic wars.
What are the dates for the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire?
Roman Republic 4xx to 28 BCE. Roman Empire 28 BCE to 476 CE, however the Byzantine Empire in the east continued until 1453 CE.
What is the difference between Roman public and Roman empire?
There really is no major difference. The Roman Empire was the empire itself, lasting from 27 BCE-476 AD (1453 for the Eastern half, which came to be the Byzantine Empire). In the beginning the Roman empire was an autocracy, headed by emperors. It then later turned into a republic, which is when people use the term Roman Republic or Republic of Rome. This is actually where the modern day type of republic comes from, Rome.
What is the the difference between Republic and pax romana?
The Republic was a type of democracy (before the empire) and not very successful. The Pax Roman was a time of peace for the Roman empire because of good trade.
Explain the difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire in the economy government and law?
The unicorn they ride is different, the Republic has magic white ones.
What is the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman Emperor?
The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.
What is the difference between roman republic and Canadian democracy?
They are not comparable. The Roman Republic was an oligarchy, not a democracy.
Who was first the roman republic the roman empire or the athenian democracy and in what order?
Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire
What was the border between the Carthaginian empire and the Roman republic in Hispania?
The Ebro River.
How were the political systems of the Roman empire and the Roman republic different?
the Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy
Who is military and political leader who transformed the roman republic into a empire?
Julius Caesar is the military leader and the dictator who transformed the roman republic into an roman empire. He assumed total power after transforming the republic into the empire.
What ended first the Roman empire or the Roman republic?
The Roman Republic was ended by the takeover of the senate by Ceaser. He essentially became the supreme ruler, or emporer. So essentially, the Roman Republic was replaced by the Roman Empire.
How did the Roman republic become the Roman empire and the holy Roman empire?
The Holy Roman Empire had nothing to do with the Romans. It was a medieval institution centred around Germany. The Roman republic became an empire by expansion both before and after the Punic wars.
Was the Roman Republic part of the Roman Empire?
Yes!
