0
The process of art criticism involves 4 actions. They are: describe, analyze, interpret and decide.
Some guidelines to help you are below:
Describe - what things are in the painting? Think of things like clothing, environment, etc.
Analyze - how are the elements of art (line, shape, form, texture, space, color and value) are used? How are the principles of unity pattern, rhythm, variety, balance, emphasis and proportion used?
Interpret - what is the artist trying to say to you? What is going on in the picture or artwork?
Judgement- What do I think about this artwork? Do I like it? Why or why not?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoDescribe-what you are seeing in the painting.
Analyse-how is the artwork organized.
Interpret-what the artist is saying to you in the painting.
Jugement-how you feel about the paiting.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoDescribeIdentifyInterpretJudge
Anonymous
1.- description
2.- analysis
3.- interpretation
4.- evaluate
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
This step in art criticism involves listing the things that are presented or actually seen in the work of art?
description
How many steps are there at the Philadelphia Museum of Art?
72 steps
What is art criticism?
Is a systematic discussion of an artwork usually involving four stages. Description, analysis, interpretation, evaluation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above sort of tries to give art criticism some sort of social and professional standing. It should be noted that the Critic's profession, be that journalistic or academic, is parasitic on the industry and creativity of artists and as such what they say is irrelevant and trivial. Art is made by an artist for public consumption and it is only art historians and history that can show the retrospective, real impact of a artist's work.
This is the process of gathering facts and information from works of art in order to make intelligent judgments about them There are four steps to this process?
Do your work on your own. Research. Read what you're supposed to.
What question should you keep in mind during all four steps of an art critique?
One question you should always keep in mind when you are critiquing a piece of art is what is the artist trying to accomplish. When you understand the perspective you can thoroughly critique a piece of work.
What is the main element that sets western art criticism apart from that of the rest of the world?
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
What differentiates art criticism from other traditions traditions of critique?
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
What differentiates western art criticism from other traditions critique?
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
What differs Western art criticism from other traditions of critique?
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy
What differentiates Western art criticism from other traditions of critique?
Western art criticism focuses on theory and philosophy.
What is the main element that sets art criticism apart from that of the rest of the world?
Western criticism focuses on theory and the philosophy of art.
What is the overarching question you should keep in mind when carrying out all four steps of art critique?
what is the work about (apex)
What is the overarching question you should keep in mind when carrying all four steps of an art critique?
D. What is the work about
What has the author Terry Michael Barrett written?
Terry Michael Barrett has written: 'Interpreting art' -- subject(s): Art criticism 'Criticizing art' -- subject(s): American Art, Art criticism, History
What effect did Dennis Diderot have on the field of art of criticism?
Diderot's "Salons" had a significant impact on art criticism by emphasizing subjective responses and the importance of the viewer's experience. He advocated for art that evoked emotion and challenged traditional hierarchies in art. Diderot's writings are considered foundational for the development of modern art criticism.
When you examine a work of art should you begin with the art criticism or the art history?
As a matter of philosophy, I would say, check out the art history - who the artist was, where he was located, materials he used and perhaps, who his contemporaries were. Art criticism is more about how successful the artist was in achieving his goal. With a knowledge of art history you would be able to understand more about the criticism.
What has the author Jerzy Stajuda written?
Jerzy Stajuda has written: 'O obrazach i innych takich' -- subject(s): Art, History and criticism, Art appreciation, Art criticism
