The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence
There is no known information that indicates GMOs are easier to grown than non-GMOs.
There is no evidence that GMOs have improved food production.
No, they do not. There are no laws that protect consumers if they do not want to eat GMOs. The consumers' only choice if they wish to avoid eating GMOs is to stop eating lots of foods that may contain GMOs.
The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence.
GMOs (genetically modified food) may create allergies.
People don't hate GMOs. Those who oppose GMOs being used commercially at this point in their development are called anti-GMOers and fearmongers, among other names.
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
No, it is an adjective in the majority of uses.
The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence.
The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence.
No, they would not be required to be labeled. No foods that contain GMOs are required to be labeled as such.