answersLogoWhite

0

Reasons for the Fall of Rome?

Updated: 8/19/2023
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Best Answer

The Romans used water pipes made out of lead, so their drinking water was contaminated.

Almost continuous wars ,to far flung outposts of the Empire as well as attacks on Rome itself. poor leadership , moral decline, loss of their own culture due to unrestricted Immigration, food shortages, debauched Emperors , and political scandals and machinations.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

The western part of the Roman Empire disintegrated over a period of 70-80 years under the strain of the invasion of Gaul by the Vandals, Sueves and Alans, and of Lorraine and the Swiss plateau by the Alemanni. The Romans lost political cohesion. There was a civil war which led to the failure to respond to these invasions. The Vandals, who reached Tunisia, became a thorn in the side, raiding the coasts of Italy in the west and Greece in the east. There was also loss of land to the Visigoths, who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the empire in 380 and moved to southwestern France in the 410s, established their independence from the Romans and expanded their kingdom into Spain. As more land lost the treasury of this part of the empire lost revenues. There were failed attempts to defeat the Vandals and the Visigoths which were also very costly. Eventually central authority collapsed. There were king makers, a high turnover of emperors and the eastern empire meddled in the politics of the west. By 486 all the lands of this part of the empire were lost.

The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1000 years (historians have coined the term Byzantine Empire to indicate this part of the empire after the fall of the western part).

More specifically:

1) The loss of unity between the western and eastern parts of the Roman Empire. This was caused by Theodosius I being succeeded by his two underage sons (Arcadius in the east and Honorius in the west) who were inexperienced and incompetent. This resulted in politicians in the east and west conspiring against each other, instead of maintaining unity and the situation came close to civil war in 407. The situation was further compounded by the invasions in the west by the Germanic peoples. The west found itself with having to deal with this on its own, especially after the failure of a combine expedition by the eastern and western navies against the Vandal in Tunisia failed. The expedition had been very expensive, involving 10,000 soldiers and 1,000 ships. The fleet of the west was captured and the fleet of the east was destroyed by using fire ships. After this there were no combined West-East military operation.

2) The conflict with the Visigoths, who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the Roman Empire to escape the invasion of their homeland in Ukraine by the Huns in 380. In 395 Alaric I, a Visigoth king had grievances with the imperial government in the east. He marched on Constantinople and the eastern Romans, who were fending off raids by the Huns in what is not Turkey and in Syria, relied on the intervention of Stilicho. However, Stilicho was ordered to leave and Alaric penetrated deep into Greece. Two years later he was trapped by Stilicho but managed to escape and continued to plunder Greece. Stilicho was suspected of connivance with Alaric. The latter was given a generalship to appease him. In 401 he invaded Italy to petition for allowing his people to settle nearer Rome, but was defeated in 402 and retreated to Illyricum (on the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea). Stilicho plotted to use Alaric's troop to seize Illyricum form the eastern empire. On the death of Arcadius, the eastern emperor, Honorius, the western emperor, and Alaric demanded compensation for his expenses. Stilicho was executed and Honorius refused to negotiated. As a result, Alaric besieged Rome three times (408, 409 and 410). On the third occasion the Visigoths asked Rome. The situation with the Visigoths highlighted the divisions between the western and eastern romans and the vulnerability of Italy.

3) Attempted invasion of Italy by Radagasius, a king of the Ostrogoths in 406. Stilicho managed to gather a force large enough to repel this invasion. Some Roman troops were redeployed from the frontier of the empire along the River Rhine in northern Gaul to Italy. This weakened the frontier and made it easier for the Vandals, Sueves and Alans to cross the frozen River Rhine and invade Gaul in 406

Invasions.

4) The Invasion of Gaul. In December 406 the Alemanni, crossed the frozen River Rhine. They then took over the Swiss Plateau and Alsace (in north-eastern France). In the same year the Vandals, Suevesand Alans reached the River Rhine. They were resisted by the Franks who lived in the area and were defeated in a first battle, but won a second battle and in December they crossed the frozen river and begun their invasion of Gaul. They ravaged Gaul for three years and eight months and then moved into Spain in 409. The Vandals and Alans then crossed into to Africa in 429 and by 439 they established the Kingdom of the Vandals with Carthage, in in Tunisia, as its capital. From there they launched many disruptive raids on the coasts of Italy and Greece. In 411 the Burgundianstook advantage of civil war among the Romans in Gaul to settle on the bank of the River Rhine in the area of today's Worms (Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany). As part of a truce, they were granted land and given the status of allies by the emperor Honorius. However, due to repeated raids in the area, they were resettled in the Savoy area of eastern Gaul by the Romans in 443. However, they soon established their impendence and started to interfere with the politics of the western part of the Roman Empire, farther contributing with its destabilisation.

5) Under the strain of the invasions, the western empire lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. This played in the hands of the invaders by weakening the Romans further and by allowing them to pay the different Roman factions off against each other. In 407, a year after the invasion of Gaul, there was a revolt in Britain and a local military man Constantine III, staged a coup, invaded Gaul with the legions of Britannia and installed himself there as a usurper emperor. There was civil war in Gaul and Spain and for four years the Romans fought each other instead of the invaders. Then in northern Gaul Jovinus was proclaimed a puppet emperor with the support of some Gallo-Roman aristocrats. |He was of the kings of the Burgundians and the Alans in northern Gaul. The Burgundians took advantage of this to cross the frontier of the empire and set up a kingdom. He was defeated by Ataulf, the new king of the Visigoths who allied with the emperor Honorius.

After the death of Honorius, Valentinian III reigned for 30 years (425-55). His commander-in-chief of the army, with the help of the Franks and Visigoths, replied an attempted invasion by the Huns in 451. The next year the Huns had to abandon and invasion of Italy. However, Valentinian murdered Aethius and then he was assassinated. Majorian (reigned 457-61) was the last capable emperor in the west. He defeated the Visigoths, who had formed a kingdom in south-western France, and the Burgundians, which both had become independent from the Romans. He then defeated the Sueves in north-western Hispania. All these peoples became subordinate allies of the Romans. He pushed further into \Spain, retaking it from the Vandals. However, an expedition to the Vandal territory in Africa was thwarted when his fleet was destroyed by treachery.

6) As the western empire disintegrated there were Germanic kingmakers and intervention of the Eastern Roman Empire and a high turnover of western emperors. Majorian was deposed by Ricimer, one of the Romanised Germanics who were enlisted in the army and rose through the ranks. He became the commander-in-chief of the Roman army in the west. He used this position and the influence he had among the Germanics in the former part of the empire to bolster his power and appointed three puppet emperors while he held the real power. He set up Majorian and deposed him because he had proved he was independent. He then set up Libius Severus, who died in 465, probably murdered by him. the next emperor, Anthemius (467-472), a former commander-in-chief of the eastern army, was chosen by Leo I, the eastern emperor and sent to Italy with an army. He organised an expedition against the Vandals by the western army, but the fleet was defeated in battle. This emptied the coffers of the western treasury. He then organised two campaigns against the Visigoths who took advantage of lack of Roman control to expand their hols in southwestern France, but both forces were also defeated. Ricimer then waged war on Anthemius, deposed him and installed Olybrius as a puppet emperor. Ricemer died five months later and Gundobad, his nephew, became commander-in-chief of the army and the new kingmaker. Olybrius died two months after this. Gundobad installed Glycerius as a puppet emperor, who lasted for one year and three months. He managed to repel an invasion of Italy by the Visigoths. However, the Visigoths took much of south-eastern France. Glycerius was not recognised by Leo I, who chose his nephew Julius Nepos, who was sent to Italy by the emperor Zeno after Leo I died. Gycerius fled without fighting. Just over a year later Nepos was deposed by his commander-in-chief, Orestes, who refused to become emperor for unknown reasons and appointed Romulus Augustus, his fourteen-year-old son as emperor. Romulus was deposed one year later, in 476, by Odoacer, who led Germanic troops in Italy which rebelled because Orestes refused to grant them land to settle in Italy. Odoacer styled himself king of Italy and pledged and gave the title of emperor of the west to Zeno, the eastern emperor, who accepted this and recognised Odoacer's rule over Italy. However, thirteen years late, in 489, Zeno offered Italy to his ally, Theoderic the Great, the king of the Ostrogoths (who had been allowed to settle in this part of the empire) if he deposed Odoacer. Zeno wanted to get rid of this powerful ally in the east. After four years of war Theoderic defeated Odoacer and established the Ostrogoth kingdom in Italy. In 486 Clovis I, the king of the Franks, took over the last land of the Romans in the west, the rump state of the Domain of Soissons.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

A number a reasons. Main two: consent attacks and threats from Hordes on their border like attilla the Hun, the goths etc. In fighting also, the empire started to be split between east and west and the rich east outgrew the west which then fell to invaders from the north and from Russia.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Two of the reasons why the Roman empire fell were a weak military and invasions by the Germanic tribes. There were several other reasons and they all combined to cause the fall of the Roman empire.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Reasons for the Fall of Rome: Weak military, bad leadership, failure to collect taxes, and Germanic invasion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

the dictators

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Duff

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Reasons for the Fall of Rome?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was the black plague after the fall of Rome?

The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.


What was the solution to the fall of Rome?

There was no solution, which is why Rome did in fact fall.


The 10 most important reasons why Rome fell?

Because of a plague that killed one tenth of the population. Also Christianity helped it fall also by making Rome peaceful.


What was the period after the fall of Rome called?

The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.The period after the fall of Rome in the west is called the Dark Ages.


What is the name of the 1000 year period after the fall of Rome?

The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.The time after the fall of Rome in the west is often called the Dark Ages.


When was a drought in ancient rome?

It was when the fall of Rome happened :)


When was The Fall of Rome created?

The Fall of Rome was created on 2005-03-07.


What made Rome prosper and what made Rome fall?

In UNCATEGORIZED


What are 4 factors that led to the fall of Rome?

Four factors? A recent study has determined that there were 210 reasons for the decline and fall of Rome. However the main ones were the pressure on the borders, the ineffective central government, the drain on the economy due to spending with no means of replacing the outflow, and an army stretched too thin.


How was its fall different from the fall of Rome?

You need to specify whose fall you are referring to.


The violent and insecure life europe after fall of rome was caused by?

The fall of Rome. Rome had provided all the protection and services a society needed and when it was gone there was chaos.


What are the many reasons historains give for the fall of the roman empire?

It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.