What are the three theoretical perspectives in sociology?

Answer 1

In no particular order:

The first school of thought in sociology is called Structural Functionalism (or just Functionalism). It was developed by the French Sociologist (and father of modern sociology) Emile Durkheim. Basically, it states that all social structures have a function. There are some dysfunctions in society, in which Durkheim referred to them as social pathologies. Suicide is a major social pathology. Durkheim centered much of his theory on the fact that society is preponderant, and the individual largely doesn't exist. People's attitudes are shaped by how harshly they are regulated, and how integrated they are into society. Naturally, Durkheim gets much more specific than this, but I'm trying to give the bare basics of his theory.

The next school of thought in sociology is Conflict Theory. This theory was developed by the German philosopher Karl Marx. In his mind, history was essentially the recordings of a mass conflict that has existed for ages. His argument centered on the Hegelian dialectic (thesis vs antithesis, combination turns into synthesis, which becomes the next thesis, and so on) and argued that social forces were in conflict, and through this dialectical process would eventually work itself out (the communist revolution was supposed to do this, ending conflict, and thus ending history). Now, Conflict Theory is more focused on this dialectical power struggle, while not necessarily agreeing with his work on the economy (Communist Manifesto). Again, the individual plays little role in this theory.

The final, and newest, school of thought is an American concept known as Symbolic Interactionalism. This was developed by the sociologists Cooley and Mead (not together, they both offer unique ideas into the concept). Symbolic Interactionalism is more concerned with small groups, as opposed to the other two theories. Within each interaction, an individual interprets social expectations and mannerisms, internalizes them, and subsequently shapes how the person will conduct him/herself. Cooley's "Looking Glass Self" more definitively explains his theory (again, the individual doesn't exist in this version). Mead, however, does allow for some mention of an autonomous portion of a person, but recognizes the internalization of societal expectations.

Again, I am trying to give you the basics. If any of these theories interest you, you should look into them further!

Answer 2

Functionalism, Conflict theory, and Symbolic Interactionism

Answer 3

functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic Interactionism

Answer 4

structure functionalism, conflict, and symbolic interaction

Answer 5

structure functionalism,conflict, symbolic interaction

Answer 6

functionalist,marxist and feminist