answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Virtually all species can be arranged into a nested hierarchy highly evocative of common ancestry. That was probably the pivotal piece of evidence launching the theory of evolution as the foundational science of Biology.

There is also the fossil record which shows us that single celled organisms populated earth's oceans billions of years before the first multicellular organisms appeared. Multicellular organisms themselves dwelled solely in marine environments hundreds of millions of years before the first terrestrial forms gained ground. Fossils of plants and insects are common before any known terrestrial vertebrates. The first of these bear uncanny resemblance to sarcopterygian lungfish of the Devonian. The fossil evidence for evolution continues to mount from there--dinosaurs and birds dominating the mesozoic, mammals and flowering plants running rampant in the cenozoic.

In addition to the nested hierarchy and the fossil record there is substantial evidence from molecular biology in support of evolution. DNA sequences in eukaryotes accrue mutations at varying rates that help establish genetic clocks timing diversification events between species.

Embryological development is another key piece of evidence indicating common ancestry between species. There are numerous other substantial and significant pieces of evidence, but this small handful is a good start.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What can be considered evidence for evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why is the geological column considered evidence for evolution?

cause of county affirs


What biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?

Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include a. DNA b. amino acids c. porteins d. all of the above Answer: D. All of the above


Biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?

Go to google and not to answer.com


Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?

I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.


What is indirect evidence?

Indirect Evidence of Evolution - is looking for signs of the results of evolution. - is evidence that can be used to deduce what you are trying to understand.


Is similarities an early development not evidence for evolution?

It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.


Why is evolution considered a theory and not a hypothesis or a law?

In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.


Some snakes have vestigial legs Why is this considered evidence for evolution?

Because it shows that that species' ancestors walked on legs, but due to evolution their legs are no longer needed and recede over generations.


Why can't intelligence be evidence of evolution?

Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.


Homology is evidence of what?

Evolution


What is the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to what evidence?

In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.


What evidence do we have for local adaptation?

how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?