Answer:
The rise of militant Islam is an International political games to get control of Islamic countries and of their resources. Otherwise could you give one reason why this claimed Islamic terrorism didn't occur before the USA presidency of Bush (the father and the son)!!!. In addition, the rise of national resistance in some countries against occupation is logic and legitimate, as happened sometime ago in France against occupation. However, these national resistance movements when arise by Muslims in an Islamic country against occupation it is considered arise of militant Islam or terrorist movements. Could you find reason for this attitude? Why no one calls the resistance to occupation in Palestine as national resistance or Palestinian resistance while called instead Islamic terrorism or Islamic Militants. Also, in Afghanistan, could you tell why is the resistance to occupation called terrorism or Islamic Militants and is not called Afghanistan resistance to occupation?.
Another example is from Iraq. It is well proven presently that all the nuclear issues against Iraq were fabricated just to justify occupation of Iraq by the Western allies. You may say that this occupation ruled out the dictatorship ruling in Iraq. It is true that Iraq was governed by a dictator. However, this was the same case with the former ruling systems in Spain and Iran why these two countries were not also occupied by Western Allies. Iraq was governed by a dictator but was achieving the highest social and economic development records in the area and there were no blood sheds and national wars in Iraq as the case now. Could you call Iraqi resistance to occupation Islamic militants or terrorism?.