0
The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process which took several decades. The process was determined by several factors. It was precipitated by the invasions by the Germanic peoples (the Vandals, the Sueves) and the Alans (who were Iranian speakers) who invaded the empire and took over north-western Africa and part of Spain, the Alemanni who took over Switzerland and northwester France and the Burgundians who settled in east France The loss of the agricultural rich territory in Africa lead to a significant loss in revenue for the Roman government. The Visigoths, another Germanic people, who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the Roman Empire and then moved to south-western France,took advantage of the situation to take over Hispania (Spain and Portugal). The Romans lost political unity. There were usurpations and infighting which made it difficult to respond to the invasions effectively. There was also a failure by the combined fleet of the western and eastern part of the Roman Empire to dislodge the Vandals from Africa. It ended in disaster and was very costly. The Romans army became reliant on Germanic soldiers and two Germanic commanders-in chief of the Roman army and installed puppet emperors (three by Ricimer, one by Gundobad and one by Orestes.Amidst this political instability, the reign of the last emperors was short.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who Invaded Western Europe after the Fall of Rome?
Vikings, and German Barbarians
How and why did the roman empire ultimately fall what happpend to the eastern and western halves of th empire follwing the fall from rome?
i would say because germanic odoacer the last emperor who ruled the western part of rome.
During the fall of Rome was Rome set to flames?
The term fall of Rome can misleading because it does not refer to the city of Rome. It refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of the western part of the Roman Empire were lost (Western Europe up to the rivers Rhine and Danube, most of the former Yugoslavia, and Britain). During this process, Rome was sacked three times (by the Visigoths, 410, the Vandals, 455, and Ostrogoths, 456). There was plundering, the capture of slaves (on the second occasion) and some buildings were burnt. However, the city was not burned down and it survived these sacks.
What were the years of ancient Rome?
The years of ancient Rome run from the founding of the city in 753 BC to the fall of the western empire in 476 AD.
What is the thesis of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. Historians have argue for a great number of reasons or factors which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Therefore, there are many theses. There are even historians who argue that this part of the Roman Empire did not fall. Instead, there was a transformation of this part of the empire into a new system of governance and culture. The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
Which of the causes of the fall of the western roman empire do you think was most significant?
Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.
Is the theory that the influx of barbarians to rome contributed to the fall of rome?
The western part of the Roman Empire fell under the strain of the invasions. The eastern part of this empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1000 years.
How did the fall of Carthage affect Rome?
Rome gained ascendancy in the Western Mediterranean.
Who Invaded Western Europe after the Fall of Rome?
Vikings, and German Barbarians
What role did Julius Caesar play in the fall of Rome?
Julius Caesar had no role in the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire whatsoever. He died 520 years before the conventional date given for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (which is sometimes called the fall of Rome).
How and why did the roman empire ultimately fall what happpend to the eastern and western halves of th empire follwing the fall from rome?
i would say because germanic odoacer the last emperor who ruled the western part of rome.
What events contributed to the fall of Rome?
The Barbarian attacks on Rome partially stemmed from a mass migration caused by the Huns' invasion of Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors rampaged through northern Europe, they drove many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire.
Why was there a fall in ROme?
There was not a fall in Rome. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What government system emerged throughout western Europe after the fall of rome?
The feudal system .
The fall of Rome ended in alexandria?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (in western Europe and northwestern Africa. The eastern part of the Roman Empire (in the eastern Mediterranean) continued to exist for another 1,000 years. Therefore, the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire did not involve Alexandria which was in Egypt and, therefore, in the part of the Roman Empire which continued to exist.
During the fall of Rome was Rome set to flames?
The term fall of Rome can misleading because it does not refer to the city of Rome. It refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of the western part of the Roman Empire were lost (Western Europe up to the rivers Rhine and Danube, most of the former Yugoslavia, and Britain). During this process, Rome was sacked three times (by the Visigoths, 410, the Vandals, 455, and Ostrogoths, 456). There was plundering, the capture of slaves (on the second occasion) and some buildings were burnt. However, the city was not burned down and it survived these sacks.
What is the fall of rome like?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
