This question, as posed, is unanswerable in any meaningful way. Israel (in its history of 64 years) has had over 35 political parties (of significance) that have run different campaigns in different districts in different time-periods. Israeli voters are also not one monolithic bloc (otherwise there would not be so many parties) and arguments which may hold sway over one group of voters would be strongly repulsive or irrelevant to another group.
Like any other democratic country, Israeli politicians represent the hopes, dreams, goals, and ideals of the people who voted them into power. The most common "argument" between Conservatives and Liberals in Israel is over how to make peace most effectively with Arab countries. Liberals are known to embrace the land for peace stance and Conservatives are known to place an emphasis on peace first and then land.
by starting a community fundraiser
The nominee used propaganda to try to gain support from voters.
Why not? More peace is always better. However, the USA cannot solve the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Only Israelis and Palestinians can do that, but the USA can provide the necessary guarantees and resources to make a peace plan viable.
electors from each state officially select the next president each party's presidential candidate uses speeches, debates, and advertising to try to win support from voters
It depends how you are using the term. You might try electorate or electors, voters, support, following, patrons, backing. For others try http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/constituency.
younger voters
It honestly depends on perspective. The Arabs claimed that the Israelis started it for having the audacity to realize their dreams for creating an independent country. The Israelis claimed that the Arabs started it for having the audacity to violently try to repress their dreams to create an independent country. As for what particular event started the conflict, every person would claim something else.
Try documentaryaddict.com
You might want to try the Israeli websites.
Turkey, for many years was an anomaly in the Middle East: a Muslim-majority country with strong diplomatic and cultural relations with Israel. The Turks attempted to use this unique historical and cultural character to mediate between Israel and Palestine. After the Flotilla Incident, Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan made sharp comments to Israelis and endorsed anti-Israeli TV show leading to Israel declaring them to be clearly biased.
Typically land concessions, but it depends on the negotiation in particular.
africa