That would depend on the religion involved. In the United States of America, the Government has no business interfering with religious dogma, tradition and issues.
Politics should not and legally can not be involved with this issue. People within these parties may have an opinion, but legally the parties should not be involved. Separation between church and state was originally setup to prevent politics from being involved with these issues, not to prevent the church from interfering with politics.
Thomas Jefferson made the issue very clear by explaining the wall of separation that the state should never tear down. The issue has always been that the government should not get involved with the church.
Two certain interest groups in America today could be NRA (national rifle association), protecting gun rights and gun owners, or NASFA (provide international education and providing oppurtunity into carrer fields). Hope this helped someone!
the framer believed that political parties were factions. a faction is usually a dissatisfied group formed within a larger group. the framers thought that factions might fight to promote the interest of their own members. they feared that the strongest faction would control the government. in such a case, government would not protect equal rights and interests of all the people. instead the government would promote the interests of the party in power.
There were differing views between the founding fathers on the strength of the national government when writing the Constitution. The first political parties in the US were the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans(jeffersonians). The federalist favored a strong centralized government, much like that of in England. While the Federalist favored states-rights and disliked the government of England.
It threatened their political rights.
The difference is that a political party is part of how a politician is identified and interest groups are groups that focus specifically on certain issues. Depending on the issue interest groups tend to support a political party. For instance the NRA which is for less strict gun control laws associates themselves with the Republican Party. An interest group that is supportive of equal rights for all Americans would associate with the Democrat Party.
No.
to have more rights
thigh-land is for chickenssss
the constitution did not include the bill of rights.
Saudi Arabia
I'm not sure which political groups you are asking about-- in the US, there were, of course, the two main political parties (the Democrats and the Republicans). But the 60s were an era of social movements: the women's movement (also called "women's liberation"); the civil rights movement, the gay rights movement, the anti-war movement, etc. There were also movements that tried to combine social change with politics, such as the Black Panther Party.
Though of different political parties, all the delegates harmonized on civil rights.
Only 1 political party is legal in Vietnam and that party is Communist. There are other parties but they are not legal within the country. The voting rights in Vietnam are very similar to those in the United States; you must be at least 18 years of age.
Because of the political power of the church.
The individual political parties (Democrat OR Republican) do not pass laws. Laws are passed by the entire Congress made up of members of both political parties.
Australia has two main political parties: the Liberal Party of Australia, which is generally considered center-right and advocates for free markets and individual liberties, and the Australian Labor Party, which is center-left and focuses on workers' rights and social welfare policies. Other minor parties, such as the Greens and various independent parties, also play a role in the Australian political landscape.
So people can show their legal beliefs under a group. People have rights.