That phrase is not in the constitution. The exact phrase is "promote the general welfare" in the preamble (Note that the word provide is used in the context of 'provide for the common defense')
It does not mean that everyone gets welfare as defined today.
Within the context of the constitution, the aspects of the 'general welfare' are enumerated in Article I, section 8 - these items are the embodiment of promoting the general welfare.
The commitment to promote the general welfare of all persons, as opposed to protecting the interests of a narrow section or class of the population, encapsulates what is most unique about the United States of America--that it is the only modern nation-state republic founded on this principle.
Lyndon LaRouche has identified the principle of the general welfare as the only legitimate basis for the authority of government. A useful summary may be found, for example, in LaRouche's article, ``Will the U.S.A. keep its sovereignty?'' published in the November 19, 1999 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
LaRouche emphasizes that our United States republic ``came into existence as direct heir of those anti-oligarchichal, anti-Roman, Platonic principles of natural law'' which were first affirmed in the founding of the first nation-state republics during the late 15th Century: France under Louis XI, and England under Henry VII. LaRouche describes the source of this law as ``a combination of the Classical Greek, republican heritage, with those doctrines, respecting the universal notion of human individuality, which were promulgated by Jesus Christ and his Apostles, notably the Epistles of the Apostle Paul.''
Out of this, came the central principle upon which ``the authority, powers, and responsibilities of the sovereign nation-state republic were premised ... the notion of `general welfare,' or commonwealth.'
``The authority of the sovereign state lies solely in its indispensable role in promoting the general welfare of all persons, as Genesis I, and the Christian apostolic mission define all persons, as made equally in the image of the Creator of the Universe, and thus equally subjects of the obligation to promote the welfare of both the living and their posterity,''
LaRouche wrote, adding that, ``Only sovereign government has the means to promote the conditions of the general welfare respecting all of the people and all of the land-area, both for the living and future generations,'' and that thus, the existence of such sovereign nation-state republics is shown to be ``the morally required condition of mankind.''
This stands in opposition to those forms of oligarchical rule, in which the government is the private property of a ruling oligarchy, either a feudalistic, landed oligarchy, or a financier oligarchy of the sort that the British monarchy represents today. In such cases, governments exist to preserve the power and wealth of such oligarchies, and not to promote the general welfare of all citizens.
by Edward SpannausAmerican Almanac, May 15, 2000.to give aid to all
common welfare is when an american
Common Defense and Welfare
The Preamble: "Provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare".
Common Welfare is the good of the entire community or also known as the "common good."
The answer to this question is to establish justice .To insure domestic tranquillity. To provide for the common welafare . To provide for the common defence. To promote the general welfare and to secure the blessing of liberty.
our taxes
Pay your taxes. The government will provide the welfare part.
"Weal" means benefit. Something that is for the common weal is for the common good. It is the root of our words wealth and welfare.
"Weal" means benefit. Something that is for the common weal is for the common good. It is the root of our words wealth and welfare.
to provide an effective militarycourse to protect all of the states
Depending on the context of the terms it might indeed display a difference. In common parlance however there would be no difference between them. Considering common and general to mean the same thing, there is no difference. Considering welfare not as "free stuff" but meaning the same as good then there is no difference.
They didn’t provide for “public welfare.” This is a modern concept and for thousands of years people did the best they could to live.