Nothing, or more accurately, it breaks the usual conventions so it's impossible to say what the person who wrote it intended it to mean. You aren't allowed to have the same signifier on both sides.
trythgttrf
XLXX is really nonsense and not a correct number. It represents 50 - 10 + 10 + 10 which would be 60. The proper way to write it is LX.
It is 60 because XLXX can be simplified to LX = 50+10 = 60
The Roman numerals "XXV" stand for the number 25.
They don't stand for anything because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
trythgttrf
XLXX is already in Roman numerals. In Arabic numerals it would be the number 60. L=50 X=10 XX= ten and ten which = 20 XL = ten before 50 which = 40 So XLXX reads 10 before 50 plus 10 plus 10 = 60
XLXX is really nonsense and not a correct number. It represents 50 - 10 + 10 + 10 which would be 60. The proper way to write it is LX.
It is 60 because XLXX can be simplified to LX = 50+10 = 60
The Roman numerals "XXV" stand for the number 25.
They don't stand for anything because they are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals
Do you mean what do the Roman numerals XXVII stand for? If so then they stand for the number 27.
There is no K in Roman Numerals.
XL1 in roman numerals stand for 41.
In Roman numerals LXI is equivalent to 61
ML stands for 1050 in Roman numerals.
In Roman numerals, L stands for 50.