What would you like to do?
Founding fathers Basically, the Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the government under the Articles of Confederation proved to be unstable and in…efficient. The document provided very little structure in terms of a federal government. Each state used their own currency and there was little unity. Finally, with Shay's rebellion in Massachusetts and no standing army to counteract it, the Founding Fathers came to the conclusion that a new government and constitution needed to be drawn up which would give America a stronger federal government while still preserving state's rights. More input from FAQ Farmers: * The Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the current government of the Articles of Confederation was not working due to the balance of powers between state and federal governments. The document gave state governments too much power and left the federal government helpless in both defending and caring for American interests. This eventually led to almost no unification of the states. Two parties emerged. The federalists, who lobbied for a strong central government, and the anti-federalists who emphasized state and individual rights. The two parties compromised and worked together to ratify the new Constitution that granted more power to a federal government and granted less power (but still protected) to the states. * After the Shay's Rebellion, the Fouding Fathers realized how weak the Articles of Confederation was. The federal government was powerless to stop the rebellion and Congress had little power. Some weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation included that was no chief executive, Congress had no power to tax citizens directly, no power to draft an army, had no national court system, no power to settle arguments among states, and many more. This led to the Constitutional Convention (started by Alex Hamilton), where the AoC was scrapped and a new constitution was written.
Precisely that, a government whose form, structure and powers were defined by a written constitution so that it could not usurp more power than had been granted it by the peop…le. Michael Montagne In order to have a clear and just conception of the nature and object of government, it is indispensable to understand correctly what that constitution or law of our nature is, in which government originates; or, to express it more fully and accurately, that law, without which government would not and with which it must necessarily exist. Without this, it is as impossible to lay any solid foundation for the science of government, as it would be to lay one for that of astronomy, without a like understanding of that constitution or law of the material world, according to which the several bodies composing the solar system mutually act on each other, and by which they are kept in their respective spheres. tyler
Answer They wrote the Constitution so that they would have rules to govern and control the growing countries. Answer The articles of confe…deration were too general to keep the new country together. It would have been too hard to revise the articles of confederation so they started from scratch.
The original constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was extremely weak. Its only success was in establishing laws for new territories. It did not provide guidelines to h…ow to pay off war debts, how to pay Revolutionary soldiers, collect taxes, or how to protect the U.S. from other countries. The national government was so weak under these articles that there was no way to address any of the problems facing the new nation.
Answer James Madison.
This is one reason among many: the founding fathers realized that the Articles of Confeneration had a serious drawback regarding its mechanism of change to itself. In or…der for the articles to be amended, all states had to agree to the change. There were also problems with the authority of the articles to enforce its own provisions, and too much ambiguity around the individual state rights to engage in some economic, monetary and international activities.
George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Adams
Which of these serves as an introduction to the US Constitution and outlines the founding fathers intentions regarding the Constitution's meanings?
The Preamble serves as an introduction to the Constitution.
To restrain the federal government. Also the checks and balances are supposed to restrain the government. Lastly, guarantees of rights.
They feared that the country would remain debt-ridden and weak which would lead other countries to injure our commerce on the seas, form alliances with states of regions to pi…t States against each other, and impact commerce among the states. The Articles of Confederation proved to be impotent throughout much of the Revolutionary War. They had the right to ask the states for funding, but the states were not reliable in providing it. It's a miracle that we survived until victory with much credit due to Robert Morris's personal financing with assistance from Haym Salomon.
What is separation of powers and how did the founding fathers use this principle in the constitution?
That section of the constitution (articles 1-5) isn't terribly long, so I suggest you don't trust me or anyone else who would tell you the answer to this question because you …never know what kind agenda might have. And, when someone starts off telling you that, they should be trusted even less. This is the principle of separation of powers and it is the principle of our legal system. TRUST NO ONE with all the power. Even if one person or group do a good job with it, they're bound to let it get to their head and abuse it, monarchy style. The President should, in most matters, be a secretary and a consciousness of the nation in times when Congress doesn't do their job. The only time they're really supposed to do more than oversee is when there's a war.Congress, as the makers of Law, approvers of treaties and holder of the purse, should be the most powerful of the branches. The Judicial System is there to correct mistakes as well...they are should be used as a last resort. And, given how many steps there are before one can get to them, they should be used very infrequently...so much anymore, even our highest courts are over-crowded. This is not a good sign. Try to read the whole thing. It's only about 7,000 words and shouldn't take more than 45 minutes to bust through it.
preserve unalienable rights. It ain't perfect but with time our descendants have the choice to make it better.
Because they had just fought an entire war to break away from a strong, distant, central government. So you can see how forming a strong central government might have been a b…it of a scary idea to these men.
Do the founding fathers of the constitution deserve the reverence Americans have traditionally given them why?
The founding fathers could have been arrested for treason anytime up until Britain recognized their country. Many did lose family, lands and business due to their involvement …in trying to start the new country. Some ended up living away from their families for years, due to the work they were doing. Another reason for admiration is the depth of knowledge and thought they brought to writing the constitution and the Bill of Rights.