answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)

The 6th amendment right to counsel. Through 14th due process, 6th amendment was applied to the states. Mr. Gideon was accused of stealing items from a pool hall, was arrested, and went to trial (as indigent-no money to hire an attorney). He asked for an attorney, the judge said no, citing earlier cases. Gideon was convicted and appealed. The Supreme Court said that if there is a chance you could go to jail, then you should be provided an attorney if you cannot afford one. Before an attorney was supplied only if it was a capital case.

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution requires the states to provide defense attorneys to criminal defendants charged with serious offenses who cannot afford lawyers themselves

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What due process rights did Gideon v. Wainwright address?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was Gideon v wainwright a civil rights or civil liberties case?

both


When the police read you your rights what was included because of the case of Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)The Miranda Warning is a requirement that police inform anyone in police custody of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment constitutional rights, per the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, (1966). The decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, (1963) was responsible for inclusion of Sixth Amendment protection, which may be stated as:You have the right to remain silent.Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with you while you are being questioned.If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before any questioning, if you wish.You can decide at any time to exercise these rights and not answer any questions or make any statements.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


How many justices decided Gideon v. Wainwright?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Gideon v. Wainwright, (1963) was decided by a unanimous vote of all nine justices on the US Supreme Court.Justices Hearing GideonChief Justice Earl WarrenJustice Hugo BlackJustice William O. DouglasJustice Tom C. ClarkJustice John Marshall Harlan IIJustices William J. Brennan, Jr.Justice Potter StewartJustice Byron WhiteJustice Arthur GoldbergFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was Florida's argument in the US Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright?

Florida argument came from an earlier case, Betty v Brady, which said that right to counsel provided by the fourteenth amendment does not compel states to provide counsel to any defendant. Also, Gideon did not commit a capital offense.(the 14th amendment transfers the laws in the Bill of Rights to the states)


How did the US Supreme Court incorporate part of the Bill of Rights to the States in Gideon v. Wainwright 1963?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark US Supreme Court case that incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. In this case, the Court ruled emphatically that indigent defendants were entitled to court-appointed lawyers at critical stages of prosecution, including arraignment and trial.An earlier case, Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45 (1932) had already extended that right to state defendants in capital (death penalty) cases, but the Supreme Court later allowed the states to exercise case-by-case discretion with regard to providing attorneys for other serious criminal offenses in Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455 (1942).For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What due process rights did Katz v US address?

A reasonable expectation of privacy


What was precedent before Gideon v. Wainwright?

The precedent followed prior to Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) was established in Betts v. Brady,316 US 455 (1942), which held the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause didn't require states to provide court-appointed counsel to indigent defendants except in death penalty cases. The Supreme Court reversed this decision in Gideon because access to counsel was necessary to protect a defendant's fundamental constitutional rights.


Was there any national events going on during the supreme court case Gideon vs Wainwight?

Yes, there were several significant national events occurring during the Gideon v. Wainwright Supreme Court case. Some notable events include the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, the Civil Rights Movement and ongoing demonstrations against racial segregation, and the escalating involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War.


Warren Court?

Lead by Chief Justice Earl Warren, it was known for preserving individual rights and many claimed that the decisions it made overstepped its jurisdiction and was too involved in people's lives. Cases included Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Griswold v. State of CT, Miranda v. Arizona, and Loving v. State of VA.


An accused person has the right to an?

They have(if in the Us) all the rights in the United States Constitution. But when someone is under arrest the arresting officer must read the person their Miranda Rights. Miranda rights are what you here on all those TV shows..."you have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to AN ATTORNEY. if you cannot afford an attorney one will be given to you" etc. This was established by Miranda v. Arizona case. and the right to counsel(an attorney) was established by the case; Gideon v. Wainwright.


What is due process and what is its relationship with the Bill of Rights?

What is due process and what is its relationship with the bill of rights?


How are the Gideon and Escobedo and Miranda cases similar?

All three cases dealt with a person's rights when arrested/on trial. Gideon dealt with the right of court-appointed representation, Escobedo, the right to counsel, and Miranda, right to remain silent when arrested.