The engine in your Honda is what's called an "interference type." That means that if the timing is off, the cylinder can come into contact with your valves (not sure if it's the intake, exhaust, or both). That is a VERY expensive problem. The timing belt controls the timing, so I would highly recommend you replace it on the manufacturer's recommended intervals (90k miles or so). While you're at it, replace the water pump, as most of the cost is labor to get to the timing belt, you might as well replace another $40 part while your in there (after ~$500 of labor or so).
The 2003 Honda Civic is an interference engine and as such if the belt breaks you will have engine damage. Replace the cam belt every 105,000 miles.
A 2011 Honda Civic does not have a timing belt on it. The vehicle does have a timing chain on it.
timing belt change 2008 civic
The 2007 Honda Civic has a timing chain that should last the life of the engine.
Usually if the timing belt breaks you have to replace the head or the bent valves. Sometimes the damage can be much worse and the entire engine can be wiped out. When the timing belt breaks, your cams and valves stop moving but the pistons don't. The pistons will smash against the stopped valves and bent them and on some occasions can break pistons as well.
No, the 2010 Honda Civic Hybrid has a timing chain that should last a life of the engine.
timing belt
Yes, A 1991 civic uses a timing belt, not a timing chain.
Your 2001 Honda Civic has a timing belt. Your engine is an interference engine and as such if the cam belt breaks serious engine damage will occur. Replace the belt at 110,000 miles and also replace the water pump which is driven by the belt.
The pistons hit the valves and your engine is basically ruined.
It must be a timing CHAIN . The Gates website does not list a timing belt for the 1.8 liter and the 2.0 liter in a 2007 Honda Civic
no