The bond money is only to ensure that the accused shows up for court. As long as the accused attends all their court appearances, it makes no difference whether they are found guilty or not, the person putting up the bond will have it returned to them. If the services of a bail bondsman are used, the only cost will be the fee for using their services (usually somewhere around 10% of the bail amount). However - if the defendant fails to make a court appearance the bond money is forfeited to the court.
Bail is a fee that is paid to the courts to ensure that a person charged with a crime will return to be tried. If the accused does not return for trial, the bail money is forfeited. If the person returns for trial, the bail money is returned. So, it is in the interest of the one paying bail to ensure that the accused returns.
That is where bail bonding companies come in. For a fractional amount of the bail, they will pay your bail up front. If you return for trial, all is well (they get their money back and keep your fee). If you don't, they send a bounty hunter to find you and collect the entire amount of the bail (and turn you over to the authorities for skipping bail). But a guilty finding has no effect on the bail payer. Otherwise, bail bonding companies would all go out of business very quickly.
The same is true when an individual pays bail. If you pay someone else's bail and they are later found guilty of the crime, that has no effect on the bail payer. If the person returned for trial, the bail money would have been returned to you. If you pay their bail and they skip, you lose the bail money and will have to find the person to get it from them. If they are ultimately found and tried and found guilty, they will be sentenced for their crime (jail, fine, etc.). But the person who posts bail is not affected by the verdict in the criminal case. Paying bail for an ultimately guilty person is not a crime.
You will lose the bail money in some states the bail money goes towards fines whether the person flees or not you will get the left over money if they dont flee but may not be much. If you cant trust that the person will return.to court after u bail them out then dont do it simple as that I wouldnt bail anyone out unless it were.my family but also depending on what theyre in for
You should still get your money back. The bail is just to make sure that they show up to their court dates. Sentencing shouldn't effect it.
once the person was found not guilty that person cannot be tried again for the same offence. This is due to the fifth ammendment.
It was a landmark case where CPA's were found guilty of criminal charges without committing fraud... they were found guilty on the basis of gross negligence. They were later given a presidential pardon
Santank.
Santank.
James Earl Ray confessed to the murder, and thre days later retracted that confession. He was found guilty by a court. Years later a jury found Loyd Jowers guilty (with "other unknown conspirators") of the wrongful death of Dr King.
He was found not guilty during a criminal trial for the offense but was found culpable for the offense during a later civil trial brought by the victim's parents.
Double jeopardy forbids that he can be retried.
No, not unless there is new evidence. To retry a person for a crime who has all ready been found guilty or innocent is double jeopardy and not allowed under the constitution.
Only if you received a citation and was later found guilty. Generally if you get cited it is you who was at fault in the accident, you can avoid the points by successfully fighting it in court or pleading guilty and doing traffick school.
hi
No he did not, it was after the second trial when he was found not guilty, remember the motorcade drove from the house to court and back to Neverland after the not guilty verdict then weeks later he left Neverland forever to go overseas.
He was the leader of the "Black Shirts" in Italy during the WW2, a bombastic sort he became an ally of Hitler, he was later found guilty.