That may not be completely true. Mom's tend to shower more affection on the children who need her the most. The others who have more common sense or may be older she doesn't have to pay so close attention to them.
Unless the order states otherwise, the amount of support does not change when one child attains majority/becomes emancipated.
not if the adoption was voluntary and not a result of any court order declaring her unfit as a parent to that child.
There are many ways to symbolize an annoying child. One is to show a child that is tugging on their mother's shirt. Another is to show someone covering their ears while a child is talking.
The placenta is where the material between mother and child, like nutrients and oxygen, travel from one to another.
No one knows. As far as the Greek myths go, Demeter, Persephone's mother, never had another child.
Not sure if you want to hurt him or not but it's the biological parents obligation to provide for their child regardless of how many they have. It's the child's right. And if you need benefits from the state they will go after him first. If he can not support another child he should not have gotten one or he needs to get a second job.
people do surveys to see how to better or improve a business or to see who prefers one thing to another...
To break up with the one you love just to go back with the mother of your child is not the solution. What you should be doing is staying with the person you love; meet with the mother of your child and tell her you will support your child and be part of that child's life and there is no reason why the mother of your child can't get out and work. To break up with the one you love and end up living with the mother of your child will only create heartbreak between the parents of that child and it will not be a good environment for that child.
There are there differences between the DNA charts for the mother and the child because the child only shares one half of the mother's DNA. The other half of the child's DNA comes from the father.
No one gets "more"; it's based on income. The first child's mother is no more special & does not deserve any more than the second.
The committee pairs adults then they apply for children. When they are accepted they are given their first child, then they apply for another and get that child. Each family can only have one mother, one father, one son, and one daughter. (It is considered a disgrace to not have children.)
No, the mother is the one that paid for taking care of the kid and is the one that should be reimbursed for it. If the mother has passed, the money is owed to her estate.