answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Gibbons v. Ogden prevented states from establishing or enforcing similar monopolistic transportation laws, encouraging growth of steamboat travel and cargo shipping. This expanded trade opportunities between states, boosting states' economies. Landlocked states were better able to participate in regional trade because they gained access to all navigable US waters. The decision in Gibbons created opportunities for the development of more efficient and sophisticated means of transporting people and goods, such as the railroad.

Case Citation:

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

For more information, see Related Questions, below.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

any states in the early 1800s passed laws to protect businesses within their borders. New York gave two men the exclusive right of steamboat navigation on the state's waters. One of the men was Robert Fulton, who invented the steamboat Clermont. Aaron Ogden had a special license from the men to use steamboats on the state's waters. Ogden requested that a local court stop Thomas Gibbons from running his boats, which competed with Ogden's. The court agreed and issued Gibbons an injunction to stop using his boats in New York.

Gibbons appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He had permission from Congress to use his steamboats between New Jersey and New York waters. Business that involves more than one state isinterstate trade. Congress regulated interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the case.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

It ensured that the federal government could supersede the state government.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

regulating commerce under one uniform law

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

regulating commerce under one uniform law

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were the effects of the Gibbons v. Ogden ruling?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What wwas the result of the supreme court ruling in gibbons v. ogden?

ruling* Gibbons v. Ogden*


What effects did the ruling in the gibbons v. Ogden case have on federal government?

pota


What effects did the ruling in the gibbons v ogden case have on federal government?

pota


What effect did the ruling in the gibbons v ogden case have on federal government?

pota


The supreme court ruling in gibbons v ogden expanded the?

Commerce power to include all commercial interactions


What case resulted in the supreme court in a ruling the grant congress board powers over interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden is the name of the case that resulted in the Supreme Court in a ruling that grants Congress board powers over interstate commerce.


What cases resulted in a supreme court ruling that granted congress broad powers over interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden


What is the disposition of this case Gibbons v Ogden?

Reversed- judgement in favor of Gibbons


Who were Thomas Gibbon's lawyers in the court case Gibbons v. Ogden?

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)Plaintiff's Counsel (Gibbons)William WirtDaniel WebsterRespondent's Counsel (Ogden)Thomas Addis EmmetThomas J. Oakley


Do you agree with Marshall's ruling that Gibbons had a right to compete with Ogden's ferry line?

Yes, Marshall's ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden affirmed that the federal government, not the states, had the authority to regulate interstate commerce, including ferry services. This decision established a precedent for federal regulation of commerce and laid the foundation for the expansion of federal power in regulating the economy.


What landmark supreme court cases further establishes the supremacy clause?

Gibbons v Ogden


Which of the following was the subject of the case Gibbons v. Ogden the operation of a competing steamboat service between New York and New Jersey establishing the local government's control over inte?

gibbons v. ogden