Want this question answered?
The Head Start Program
Alice Cloutier has written: 'Beyond the mandate--national strategy for the integration of persons with disabilities' -- subject(s): People with disabilities, People with disabilities in the civil service, Government policy, Employment
The university's mandate said students had to complete English 101 before taking creative writing.
When a federal law requires a lower government to meet a particular obligation, this is referred to as a federal mandate. The Americans with Disabilities Act is an example of a federal mandate.
Massachusetts
Alan McWhorter has written: 'Mandate for quality' -- subject(s): Services for, People with mental disabilities, Government policy
Yes, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Amendments Act of 2008 are unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is any piece of federal legislation which requires the states to follow a set of regulations without providing an explicit means to finance them. The ADA, ADAAA, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, etc are all examples of unfunded mandates.
Because they were the future leaders.
the commisioner mandate
synonym of mandate
In the U.S.A., federal regulations [PL 94-142 Education of All Handicapped Children Act] mandated that any school district that accepts federal funds, which means virtually every district in the U.S.A., is required to seek out, diagnose, and provide services for handicapped children: The mandate is for "appropriate and free education for students with disabilities." Speech-language disability in among the services mandated. Those services, for children age 5 -21 who are enrolled in the schools, are available free. The services are also available to children who attend religious parochial schools. Some school districts, New York City, for example, have speech therapy programs for "disadvantaged" children, beginning at age three. Some university training programs provide speech-language therapy for children who are in Head Start programs, and those services are also free. Possible sources of low cost speech therapy -- not free -- are training programs in universities that have a speech pathology curriculum. The hands-on clinical work would be done by a student, but the student would be supervised by a certified speech-language pathologist. P.S. I forgot to mention that PL 94-142 Education of All Handicapped Children Act has been amended and is now Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which covers handicapped children from birth to age 21. The Act is much broader than was the former act, and it does not mandate state participation for all of its regulations, but the final result is that you can find free speech-language services in the public schools.
In the U.S.A., federal regulations [PL 94-142 Education of All Handicapped Children Act] mandated that any school district that accepts federal funds, which means virtually every district in the U.S.A., is required to seek out, diagnose, and provide services for handicapped children: The mandate is for "appropriate and free education for students with disabilities." Speech-language disability in among the services mandated. Those services, for children age 5 -21 who are enrolled in the schools, are available free. The services are also available to children who attend religious parochial schools. Some school districts, New York City, for example, have speech therapy programs for "disadvantaged" children, beginning at age three. Some university training programs provide speech-language therapy for children who are in Head Start programs, and those services are also free. Possible sources of low cost speech therapy -- not free -- are training programs in universities that have a speech pathology curriculum. The hands-on clinical work would be done by a student, but the student would be supervised by a certified speech-language pathologist. P.S. I forgot to mention that PL 94-142 Education of All Handicapped Children Act has been amended and is now Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which covers handicapped children from birth to age 21. The Act is much broader than was the former act, and it does not mandate state participation for all of its regulations, but the final result is that you can find free speech-language services in the public schools.