0
Retribution is basically the principle of an eye for an eye. According to Ernest Van De Haag it is the paramount reason we should punish. The difference between revenge and retribution is that revenge is emotional, personal, and there is no upper limit (punishment is never enough). On the other hand retribution is rational, delivered by the state, and is just deserts.
Try to take a look at the capital punishment debate article on wikipedia. There is a section on retribution that could help you out.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoCapitol punishment.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When was retributive justice first used?
Historically, most, if not all ancient peoples used retributive justice based on the theory 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth'. Most ancient peoples living in the 'Fertile Crescent' including the ancient Egyptians, the Hittites and the Sumerians used retributive justice. The Hebrews under Moses, used this brutal form of justice. Probably one of the most notable figures in the use of this form of justice was Draco of Athens. History names him as a 'lawgiver' who drew up his brutal code of justice circa 600BC. Some extremely radical forms of Islam still use retributive justice. The Aborigines of Australia do, on occasions, use retributive justice.
Does Aristotle believe in strict retributive justice?
yah, according to Abraham Lincoln he did.
What role is played by retributive justice in the murder of Macbeth by MacDuff?
Well, Macduff was getting revenge for his wife and children who had been murdered by Macbeth. You might call that retributive.
What justice also known as the eye for an eye approach the perpetrator of crime is punished with the same wrong that he committed on the victim?
Retributive
What are the three principles of justice?
Retributive justice: focusing on punishment for wrongdoings based on the severity of the offense. Distributive justice: concerned with fair allocation of resources and opportunities in society. Restorative justice: emphasizing repairing harm caused by a crime through reconciliation between victims and offenders.
What is lex talionis?
he principle or law of retaliation that a punishment inflicted should correspond in degree and kind to the offense of the wrongdoer, as an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth; retributive justice.
Is it true that The financial and human costs of the retributive crime control policies of the 1990s are now being scrutinized?
true
Expansion of proverb A Life for life?
The proverb "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" means that the punishment should match the crime. It suggests that justice should be fair and proportional, advocating for the concept of retributive justice where the offender should receive a punishment similar to the harm they caused.
What is the marshall?
The Marshall Hypothesis is what came of Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's belief and argument that support of the death Penalty comes from a lack of knowledge about it. He believed that the more information the populace had about the death penalty, the less they would support it. (Though he believed that knowledge would make no difference to people who supported the death penalty for retributive reasons) Social Psychologists have tested this hypothesis extensively, and found that it is partially true.
What is the Marshall Hypothesis?
The Marshall Hypothesis is what came of Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall's belief and argument that support of the death Penalty comes from a lack of knowledge about it. He believed that the more information the populace had about the death penalty, the less they would support it. (Though he believed that knowledge would make no difference to people who supported the death penalty for retributive reasons) Social Psychologists have tested this hypothesis extensively, and found that it is partially true.
Justice an ethical right?
The ethical morals of justice within society's American social values which demonstrate ethical choices of right and wrong that are related to Philosophy, and choice which control the input and output of crime. Justice, a principle of moral rightness, in a functional form it is the idea that those who commit a social and ethical wrong in that system are entitled to receive a related consequence of the action within the justice system. Throughout our history, justice has been subjected to philosophical, legal, and theological reflection and debate. People in society concerned over things in proper justice like "retributive justice." Which regulates proportionate responses to crime that have been proven by lawful evidence" Which in other words the punishment that is justly imposed is considered to be morally correct and fully deserved. Justice in many cases is a natural law that involves a system of consequences which naturally derives from any action, or choice. Justice is very similar to "Newton's third law of motion." Which states "that for every action there must be an equal and opposite reaction." (Natural law, Main Article.) According to Utilitarian thinkers, justice is not as fundamental as we often think (John Stuart Mill) rather it is derived from the more basic standards of rightness or consequensitalism. Consequensitalism is a standpoint that tends to be the outcome of a valid moral judgment or consequence of an action which comes from a consequentiality (judges) point of view. Consequensitalism is best described in deontology which derives from the rightness or wrongness of a person. In deontology a person would argue that steeling is wrong in all cases, but one who follows the theories of consequensitalism might say that in some cases stealing could be morally accepted depending of the situations circumstances. Concluding World War I, the Treaty of Versailles was signed. It was aimed to establish a "peace of justice." its failure lay with its preoccupation with retributive justice and its lack of concern for reconciliation which led to a more destructive World War II. Justice is based on the equality of humanity and the mutual respect of others, its process is neither truthful of doubtful, its morals are indicated by the jury of the courts and the people of the United States of America. This essay is more than just an essay, We as Americans, and people of all equality rights. Should have a right to freedom and justice of all kinds no matter what belief you have. We see justice as a tactic to frighten others, but really it's to protect the world from its worldly ways, don't reject the laws of justice. Protect them and one day we will see a world at peace.
What is a just deserts perspective that emphasizes taking revenge on a criminal perpetrator or group of offenders?
A just deserts perspective that emphasizes taking revenge on a criminal perpetrator or group of offenders is often referred to as a retributive justice approach. It focuses on punishment rather than rehabilitation, seeking to inflict suffering and harm in proportion to the harm caused by the offender. Critics argue that this approach can perpetuate a cycle of violence and fail to address the underlying causes of criminal behavior.
