answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It is controversial whether or not there is a constitutional right to privacy. Those who believe that there is no right to privacy reason that the right to privacy is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Those who believe that there is a right to privacy believe that a right to privacy is implied by the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 14thAmendments.

One of the strongest arguments for the right to privacy is the events following America's independence. When the founding fathers discussed introducing the Bill of Rights, many were in opposition. The opposition reasoned that listing specific rights in the Constitution might imply that rights not listed therein are not rights of American citizens. Those favoring the Bill of Rights reasoned that if no rights are listed specifically, then no rights are protected. The Ninth Amendment was introduced to quell the fears of those against a Bill of Rights.

The Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution states, " The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This Amendment is used as an argument for the existence of a right to privacy. Those believing that a right to privacy does not exist often reason thus because the right is not enumerated. Those believing there is a right to privacy state the Ninth Amendment; a right not listed cannot be used to imply that it does not exist.

Another right that strongly implies a right to privacy is the Fourth Amendment. It states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The only reason that a citizen of the United States would be opposed to unreasonable search and seizure is violation of privacy or because they are hiding evidence of a crime. This Amendment is reason for many to believe that the founding fathers had the right to privacy in mind while writing the Amendments.

The Fourteenth Amendment, in the last portion of the First Article states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Some might interpret the deprivation of privacy by the state as a violation of one's liberty. Further, prior to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights applied to the federal government of the United States alone. This Amendment bars state governments from violating the rights the federal government was barred from violating (i.e. Constitutional rights.)

The First and Third Amendments may also imply privacy. The first Amendment might be taken to imply a right to privacy of one's beliefs. The Third Amendment might be taken to imply a right to privacy within one's home from troops. Prior to the third Amendment, it was often customary for troops to quarter in the private residences of citizens. The third Amendment might be taken as evidence that the founding fathers had intended to imply rights to privacy.

Various non-Constitutional privacy laws have however been enacted, at both Federal and State levels. Examples of these include HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) which addresses medical patient privacy, the Privacy Act of 1974 (functionally a reinforcement and update to the IV amendment), and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (financial privacy) among others.

Other areas where privacy laws have recently bloomed, predominantly at the State level, relate to medical issues beyond what is covered in HIPAA, including the special privacy requirements of AIDS/HIV patients and victims of criminal abuse.

Answer

While it's true the right to privacy isn't mentioned in the Constitution, the US Supreme Court decided privacy is an implied 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause.

The judicial concept is called "Substantive Due Process," which holds that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause is intended to protect all unenumerated rights considered fundamental and "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty," among these the right to privacy. Use of Substantive Due Process is considered judicial activism, in that it seeks to limit the scope of laws that undermine personal liberty, even if the law doesn't address a right specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

Earlier, Lochner-era (approximately 1897-1937, second industrial revolution) Courts used Substantive Due Process in a way that reduced protection of the individual against exploitation by businesses and the government, such as protecting the right of the individual to negotiate contracts with an employer by holding employment laws regulating minimum wage and work conditions unconstitutional.

Today, Substantive Due Process is used to protect the individual against exploitation or legislation that creates an undue burden on individuals, or on an identifiable group or class of citizens.

In order to determine whether the government has valid cause to interfere in people's lives, the Court applies a "rational basis test" to determine whether the legislation is related to a legitimate government interest. If the law passes the rational basis test, the Court next applies "strict scrutiny" to determine whether there is a compelling state interest that justifies violating the groups' or individuals' fundamental rights, and whether the law is applied as narrowly as possible to infringe those rights as little possible.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Privacy is an implied right in the first, third, fourth, and fifth amendments to the United States Constitution. Of those, the fourth amendment is probably most relevant, because it protects people from unreasonable search and seizure.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The 4th, 5th, and the 14th

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the constitutional basis for the right to privacy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

How right to privacy is implied by other constitutional rights guaranteed in the Constitution?

Two amendments in the Bill of Rights imply a right to privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from "unreasonable search and seizure". But in recent years, the Tenth Amendment is often cited as the basis of a right to privacy. The Tenth Amendments states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Some scholars and Constitutional experts believe that if there is no constitutional provision allowing an invasion of privacy by the government, then the people can claim power over their own privacy or the "right to be let alone." This belief has formed the basis in arguments in favor of the right to abortion, same-sex marriage and medical marijuana laws, among others.


Which statement best explains the legal basis for the right to privacy?

It developed gradually through legal precedents and Supreme Court rulings


On what constitutional basis did the supreme court deny korematsu's appeal?

validate a descrimination on the basis of ancestry


What is the constitutional basis for your civil rights and for laws prohibiting discrimination?

fourteenth amendment


What is the right to privacy?

In recent years there have been only few attempts to clearly and precisely define a "right to privacy." Some experts assert that in fact the right to privacy "should not be defined as a separate legal right" at all. By their reasoning, existing laws relating to privacy in general should be sufficient. Other experts, such as Dean Prosser, have attempted, but failed, to find a "common ground" between the leading kinds of privacy cases in the court system, at least to formulate a definition. One law school treatise from Israel, however, on the subject of "privacy in the digital environment," suggests that the "right to privacy should be seen as an independent right that deserves legal protection in itself." It has therefore proposed a working definition for a "right to privacy":The right to privacy is our right to keep a domain around us, which includes all those things that are part of us, such as our body, home, property, thoughts, feelings, secrets and identity. The right to privacy gives us the ability to choose which parts in this domain can be accessed by others, and to control the extent, manner and timing of the use of those parts we choose to disclose.ssAs

Related questions

How right to privacy is implied by other constitutional rights guaranteed in the Constitution?

Two amendments in the Bill of Rights imply a right to privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from "unreasonable search and seizure". But in recent years, the Tenth Amendment is often cited as the basis of a right to privacy. The Tenth Amendments states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Some scholars and Constitutional experts believe that if there is no constitutional provision allowing an invasion of privacy by the government, then the people can claim power over their own privacy or the "right to be let alone." This belief has formed the basis in arguments in favor of the right to abortion, same-sex marriage and medical marijuana laws, among others.


Which rights do not fall under constitutional arguments in favor of the right to privacy?

The right to use pornography.


Although there is no mention of privacy in the Constitution courts have recognized a constitutional right of privacy in the areas of sex reproductions and family life?

True


What has the author Ronald W Hook written?

Ronald W. Hook has written: 'The Constitutional right of privacy' -- subject(s): Homosexuality, Law and legislation, Right of Privacy, Sodomy


What was the Supreme Courts ruling in the roe v. wade case of 1973?

The right to an abortion was protected by a constitutional right to privacy.


Was the Supreme Courts ruling in the Roe v. Wade case of 1973?

The right to an abortion was protected by a constitutional right to privacy.


Which statement best explains the legal basis for the right to privacy?

It developed gradually through legal precedents and Supreme Court rulings


Do celebrities have a right to privacy?

Yes, all celebrities have a right to privacy when they are in there homes. Every American has the right to privacy.


What are privacy rights?

When you have the right to your privacy


Do you have the right to privacy in the back of a police car?

Yes and no. You don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the back of a police car, if you're referring to being observed by others.You do retain your Fifth Amendment constitutional right not to incriminate yourself, if you're referring to keeping certain personal information private.


Does the press have the right to invade individual privacy?

The concept of privacy is being eroded on a daily basis. At one time, the right to privacy was an accepted practice. Then, it began to be divided into private individuals and public individuals. If you were a movie star or a politician and courted the press to advance your career, then it was propounded by some members of the press that you had given up your right to privacy. But private individuals were still accorded some measure of privacy. As the Internet became more popular and with the creation of the social media like Face-book etc., the right to privacy has all but disappeared. Truly, Big Brother is watching you.


Constitutional issue faced in roe v wade case?

The main constitutional issue in Roe v. Wade was whether a woman's right to have an abortion is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment's right to privacy. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that a constitutional right to privacy does exist, and that it encompasses a woman's decision to have an abortion. However, the Court also acknowledged that states have an interest in protecting the potential life of the fetus, and therefore, state regulations on abortion are permissible as long as they do not place an undue burden on the woman.