There were 94 felonious killings recorded by coroners' courts in Buckinghamshire over the period 1373 to 1389. This out of a total population for the cont of perhaps 100,000. That makes the annual murder rate 7.2 per 100,000 for the county seven centuries ago. The penalty for murder then was hanging. What the murder rate is for the present day Thames Valley Police area or for modern Bucks is not easily found out. However, in 2011, there were 117 homicides in the Metropolitan Police district of London, out of a population of 7.5 million. There had been 222 ten years earlier. The London murder rate therefore is about 1.8 per 100,000 in the twenty first century, about a quarter what it was seven hundred years ago in Bucks when murderers could be hung - or have their guts cut out, or be blinded, or castrated. Modern Bucks has a lower murder rate than London, but I cannot find the stats.
you can say the crime rate is lower than Americas crime rate. so i guess that the crime rate is lower
the crime rate is 32,087
As of 2009, 63% is the crime rate in the Philippines.
The crime rate is numbers, percentages, and averages. Crime is the actual instances of criminal activity. Crime rate is the bigger picture.
your crime rate is the percentage of the crime, and the volume is the number of crimes
crime in the banlieuse is at about a high rate
The crime rate in Cameroon is about 22 percent.
your mother is the crime rate
the crime rate of peru is 1000 murders an hour
statistically speaking, it has the fourth worst crime rate in the world.
The crime rate in Democratic Republic of the Congo is 46%
The answer is clearly self-evident. If you live in a low crime-rate area, that means that your area suffers less crime than someplace else which has a higher crime-rate.