Generally this is how the concept of Induction and Deduction will move
* Induction - particular to general. * Deduction - general to particular. However this is actually untrue. Either arguments starting with or ending with a Partcular or generalisation. An argument that is Deductively invalid can be Inductively valid.
Eg; Inductivley valid, but Deductively invalid.
(Particular) My apple is red
Your apple is red
(General) All apples are red
(General) If something is red, it is a Tomato.
Your car is red
(Particular) Your car is also a Tomato Obviously untrue statements, however to constitute as Inductively valid one must only display a logical correlation of concepts.
Eg; Deductively valid.
(General) If you don't have a ticket you can't ride the bus.
You don't have a ticket.
(Particular)so, you can't ride the bus.
...maybe read the Wikipedia page too! Its hard to define but easy to understand.
Induction is reasoning down to a set of principles, from facts. Deduction is going from a generalized down to particulars.
Induction in the opposite direction
lkvmxk
Deduction STARTS with a generaliztaion! Induction ENDS with a generalization!
Neither. It is an IDENTITY.
Exemption doesn't form part of total income while deduction form part of a total income.
The Declaration of Independence uses DEDUCTIVE thinking
it is the difference between the synchronous and asynchronous speed of a induction motor
* deduction * induction * speculation
The Banker's Gain (BG) is the difference between a banker's discount and a true discount. It is a deduction with simple interest.
Intuition, induction, and deduction are types of reasoning used in geometry. Deduction uses logic to form a conclusion based on given statements.
Reduction means making the object smaller, reducing the size of something. Deduction means taking something away, making the amount smaller.