answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Inductive reasoning involves making general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and applies it to specific cases to reach a conclusion. Inductive reasoning moves from specific to general, while deductive reasoning moves from general to specific.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation.

Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

there are two main theoretical approaches for the presentation of new English grammar structures or functions to ESL/EFL students: inductive approach and deductive approach. The more traditional of the two theories, is the deductive approach, while the emerging and more modern theory is the inductive approach.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is difference between inductive theory and deductive theory?

Deductive takes the facts and finds an answer. Detectives usually use this method. Inductive takes the answer and finds the question.


What is the 3 method of economic?

deductive method inductive method


What is deductive and indeductive method according to micro economics?

inductive is when you observe that something happen


Who was originated Deductive-Inductive method?

Aristotle Or Plato


What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?

inductive theories of method means the circulation of the specific observation to broader generalization and theories


Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction?

Inductive approach involves reasoning from particular to general. While the deductive theory is the method which makes reasoning from particular to general.


Compare normative deductive and inductive approaches to theory formulation which approach is more useful in theory construction-?

Inductive approach involves reasoning from particular to general. While the deductive theory is the method which makes reasoning from particular to general.


What are the advantages and disadvantages of deductive method?

the advantages of deductive method


What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?

it ic called deduction


What is inductive deductive method?

Deductive teaching is a more traditional form of teaching. In deductive teaching you typically provide information (lecture), share specific examples of the concept or skill being taught, then, allow students to practice the skill being taught. This is a more teacher-centered model of teaching that is rule driven. Some of the positives of this method are that it is time saving and gets to the point of the lesson easily. Inductive teaching is a constructivist model of teaching that is more student-centered. In inductive teaching first provide examples, then have students practice and figure out the rule themselves. This method of teaching is more experiential and based on a guided discovery learning philosophy.


What is the difference between the inductive and deductive method of enquiry?

In general, deductive logic takes a lot of information and tries to draw a conclusion from it. Inductive logic takes one piece of information and tries to generalize from there. That doesn't necessarily make one better than another... they are each important in different circumstances. In general science for instance, deductive logic is used most often. If you have a lot of observations, you might be able to figure out more about the subject of study. In interpersonal relationships, on the other hand, inductive logic is used most often. If one person reacts a certain way, then they figure that some other people will too. Both contribute to understanding, but are usually used very differently. I would also suggest looking up the terms in an online dictionary or encyclopedia, especially if you are asking about formal definitions.


What are Strengths and weaknesses of deductive and inductive research approaches?

Inductive research approaches are more widely used than Deductive by the scientific community, but they both have there strength and weaknesses. Inductive method: -Strengths: The inductive method produces concrete conclusions about nature that are backed by a variety of observational evidence. When one of an inductive arguments premises are perceived as false, other observational evidence can be added to the premises to save the argument, this is not the case with deductive reasoning. -Weaknesses: The inductive method produces conclusions that go beyond what there premises warrant. In other words, inductive arguments take a limited amount of observations to provide a universal conclusion, which could still be false. For example, someone observes 10,000 dogs and finds that they all have flees, then inductively concludes that all dogs have flees. This is a situation where overwhelming observational evidence (10,000 dogs have flees) points to an inductively reasoned false conclusion (All dogs have flees). Deductive Method: -Strengths: Deductive reasoning dosent require painstakingly observing a variety of observational evidence to reach a conclusion. One can start off with a generally accepted axiom, or statement, and deduce conclusions based on that axiom. -Weaknesses: Deductive reasoning can make permanent the logical fallacies we have today. In other words, if you use an axiom to deduce a variety of conclusions, and that axiom turns out to be false, all of the conclusions following that axiom are false as a result. hope this helps!