0
Let f be a function that maps integers to integers such that f(x) = x/2 if x is even, and f(x) = 3x + 1 if x is odd. The generalization of the Collatz conjecture is that when creating a sequence by iterating over f, all such sequences eventually end in a cycle.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the solution to the collatz problem?
The Collatz conjecture is known to be true up to approx 5.5*10^18 but that does not prove it to be true. In 1972 John Conway proved that Collatz-type problems can be formally undecidable, so there may be no solution.
What are the top 10 unsolved math problems?
1. The Goldbach conjecture. 2. The Riemann hypothesis. 3. The conjecture that there exists a Hadamard matrix for every positive multiple of 4. 4. The twin prime conjecture (i.e., the conjecture that there are an infinite number of twin primes). 5. Determination of whether NP-problems are actually P-problems. 6. The Collatz problem. 7. Proof that the 196-algorithm does not terminate when applied to the number 196. 8. Proof that 10 is a solitary number. 9. Finding a formula for the probability that two elements chosen at random generate the symmetric group . 10. Solving the happy end problem for arbitrary .
What is an example of a TRUE conjecture?
The Poincaré Conjecture.
What conjecture can you make about the sum of the first 10 positive even numbers?
One possible conjecture is that their sum is 27. The conjecture is patently false, but that does not stop it being a conjecture.
Make a conjecture about the sum of the first 25 positive even numbers?
My conjecture is that the sum is 67. A conjecture does not have to be true, or even plausible. You should be able to test it. If it is found to be true then in is no longer a conjecture, if it is found to be false, it is rejected - and so no longer a conjecture. If it cannot be proved either way, it remains a conjecture.
What is the hardest math problems in the world?
The Collatz conjecture
What is the solution to the collatz problem?
The Collatz conjecture is known to be true up to approx 5.5*10^18 but that does not prove it to be true. In 1972 John Conway proved that Collatz-type problems can be formally undecidable, so there may be no solution.
Is 72 a conjecture?
A conjecture is a proposition that is unproven but appears correct and has not been disproven.
When was Lothar Collatz born?
Lothar Collatz was born in 1910.
When did Lothar Collatz die?
Lothar Collatz died in 1990.
What has the author Ferdinand Albert Collatz written?
Ferdinand Albert Collatz has written: 'Flour strength as influenced by the addition of diastatic ferments ..' -- subject(s): Amylases, Flour.
What has the author Sven Collatz Christensen written?
Sven Collatz Christensen has written: 'Befolkningens forbrug af sygehusydelser 1966-1978' -- subject(s): Diseases, Hospital utilization, Medical Statistics, Statistics
What are the top 10 unsolved math problems?
1. The Goldbach conjecture. 2. The Riemann hypothesis. 3. The conjecture that there exists a Hadamard matrix for every positive multiple of 4. 4. The twin prime conjecture (i.e., the conjecture that there are an infinite number of twin primes). 5. Determination of whether NP-problems are actually P-problems. 6. The Collatz problem. 7. Proof that the 196-algorithm does not terminate when applied to the number 196. 8. Proof that 10 is a solitary number. 9. Finding a formula for the probability that two elements chosen at random generate the symmetric group . 10. Solving the happy end problem for arbitrary .
How can you show a generalization is correct?
No. A generalization cannot be proved correct. Even this generalization about a generalization could be incorrect. Anywho, and generalization could never be proven correct.
How can you show generalization is correct?
No. A generalization cannot be proved correct. Even this generalization about a generalization could be incorrect. Anywho, and generalization could never be proven correct.
What is the future tense of conjecture?
Will conjecture.
What does hasty generalization?
Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence.
