Nature constitutes inherited traits, genetic predispositions carried in the DNA: height, eye color, hair color, predisposition to certain diseases or deformities. Beyond that, the argument rages whether Alcoholism and other forms of addiction or dependency have a genetic predisposition. Apparently sexual orientation is genetically determined, or at least the tendency is genetically influenced. Behaviorists are the Nurturerers. They believe that environment and experience determine behavior. In fact, it is likely that Nature determines predispositions and Nurture determines the exact form that the predisposition takes.
The meaning of Nature in the "Nature against Nurture" argument is that Nature is how you are born, that you act the way you do because of the Genes you inherit from your family. However Nurture, is where you act a certain way because you were taught that way.
the nature V's nurture debate is concerned with to what extent our development is the product of heredity (nature) and the product of environment (nurture)
This theory is concerned with whether behavior is detemined mainly by genetic inheritance "nature" or by environment and experience"nurture"
What was Piaget theory on nature vs. Nurture?
Nature vs. NurtureNature is the role of HEREDITY, while Nurture is the role of ENVIRONMENT...In NATURE, a behavior can get through hereditary, while in NURTURE, a behavior can be enhanced,or can be improved through the environment ..
Erikson, like Freud, was largely concerned with how personality and behaviour is influenced after birth- not before birth- and especially during childhood. In the mature vs nurture debate Erikson was firmly focused on nurture and experience. This can easily be seen in his stages as they are all linked to relationships.
The nature vs nurture debate is a scientific, cultural, and mostly philosophical debate. The debate is about whether human culture, personality, and behavior are caused primarily by nature or by nurture.
Nature vs nurture. You naturally an evil person or you were nurtured in evil environment which made you evil
What was Piaget theory on nature vs. Nurture?
Nature vs. NurtureNature is the role of HEREDITY, while Nurture is the role of ENVIRONMENT...In NATURE, a behavior can get through hereditary, while in NURTURE, a behavior can be enhanced,or can be improved through the environment ..
Erikson, like Freud, was largely concerned with how personality and behaviour is influenced after birth- not before birth- and especially during childhood. In the mature vs nurture debate Erikson was firmly focused on nurture and experience. This can easily be seen in his stages as they are all linked to relationships.
False. Nature refers to genetics, nurture refers to environmental conditions.
The nature vs nurture debate is a scientific, cultural, and mostly philosophical debate. The debate is about whether human culture, personality, and behavior are caused primarily by nature or by nurture.
disadvantage of nurture in ones development
Nature vs nurture. You naturally an evil person or you were nurtured in evil environment which made you evil
Nature vs nurture is a debate that has gone on for years between psychologists. If you believe in the nature side of things, you believe that we are the way we are because of genetics. If you believe in the nurture side of things, you believe that we are the way we are because of our upbringings.
The question is, are children the way they are because they were born that way (nature), or is it the way they were brought up (nurture).
The nature vs. nurture question asks whether differences in traits and behaviors are due to genetics (nature) or environment (nurture). It explores the influence of genetics and upbringing on a person's development and characteristics.
beac
Nature VS. Nurture issue.